When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Of course the results are correct and you will actually accelerate faster on the road (albeit very , very slightly) because the engine is accelerating the lighter tire faster and you will accelerate faster, so in reality, the dyno is correct stating that you have more horsepower.
This thread not exactly going the way Jim hoped it would lol!
You're right. I thought I was passing on useful-to-know info, but apparently I wasted my time. I think in the future, I won't bother. Too much work and too much criticism.
Why are people being so hard on Jim?
Some of us hardcore motorheads already knew what he is stressting, but I'll bet a lot of readers didn't.
When you accelerate a tire/wheel, it saps a lot more power than most other weight in the vehicle. There's the weight of the tire/wheel as part of the total vehicle weight, but there's an additional component of the power required to increase the rotational speed of the wheel and tire.
Interesting read, Jim. I've been into drag racing for years and have spent a lot of time, money and research to put more power to the ground in my mustang. It's proven that lighter components in the drivetrain reduces drivetrain loss by providing a mechanical advantage to transfer more power to the wheels (or wheel for a motorcycle).
I'm not sure why there is such harsh critiques. The original post showed some numbers based off of two dyno sessions using two different tires...there may be some other factors involved but the simplicity of mechanical advantage makes perfect sense to me.
Keep posting Jim, great reading , whats gonna be our next topic for discussion?
Thanks
Mirrmu
Probably long distance riding gear. I'm running an experiment on Gore-Tex textile clothing and Gore-Tex leather boots. Wind proofing, waterproofing, ventilation, and temperature range of comfort are all involved.
Nobody is being hard on him. Everyone is simply stating what has been known since the invention of the wheel. Less rotating mass equals more power to the ground. Jim made it sound like he had just discovered this.
Nobody is being hard on him. Everyone is simply stating what has been known since the invention of the wheel. Less rotating mass equals more power to the ground. Jim made it sound like he had just discovered this.
No, the point I was making is that a Dynojet dyno report is NOT a consistently accurate report on the power being produced by one engine versus another engine.
In other words, if 2 bikes each with the exact same engine show different power on the dyno it is NOT reliably because one engine builder assembled the engine better; one bikeways simply have a heavier wheel.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.