Softail Models Standard, Custom, Night Train, Deuce, Springer, Heritage, Fatboy, Deluxe, Rocker and Cross Bones.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Fuel question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 13, 2014 | 11:54 AM
  #11  
98hotrodfatboy's Avatar
98hotrodfatboy
Seasoned HDF Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 5
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 20,960
Likes: 7,487
From: Poolville
Default I agree

I have to agree, I have heard that ethanol does burn cooler creating less heat in the combustion chamber which in turn allows the motor to run cooler which will make more hp. Just like the old fuels we used to use at the race track. Remember CAM 2 race fuel. It allowed the motor to run cooler.less friction more hp plus do you think nascar would use it if it wasn't beneficial...

Originally Posted by Warp Factor
Lots of myths about ethanol. Ethanol actually burns cooler than gasoline. Corrosion hasn't turned out to be the problem people thought it would be, even when putting E-85 in older fuel tanks (they convert to E-85 on some high-performance vehicles because it makes a good "race gas".... it's higher octane and burns cooler, isn't as toxic as leaded gas, and is easier to get).

Premium gas in Michigan has contained ethanol for at least 20 years now, and there haven't really been problems with it. Yes, it will run slightly leaner on older engines without oxygen sensors, which can't self-adjust to get the slightly richer ideal mixture.

Storage? People put vehicles up for the winter all the time in Michigan with E-10 in the tank, with no problems in the spring.

Running "regular" gas? Sure, it will work, but it takes away some of the safety margin against detonation, a major engine destroyer. And when the engine management system senses detonation (and it will do this before you can hear it), it will pull timing, costing some power and fuel economy.

I've had the same tankful of E-10 in in my standby generator for two years now, and there is no fuel or water separation, and nothing else strange going on.
 
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2014 | 12:09 PM
  #12  
oct1949's Avatar
oct1949
Club Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 145,895
Likes: 821
From: 40 miles Northeast of Indy..
Default

I'd go with the 93,, just me
 
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2014 | 04:45 PM
  #13  
chrisj49's Avatar
chrisj49
Tourer
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 494
Likes: 63
From: Bay Area, CA
Default

Originally Posted by 98hotrodfatboy
I have to agree, I have heard that ethanol does burn cooler creating less heat in the combustion chamber which in turn allows the motor to run cooler which will make more hp. Just like the old fuels we used to use at the race track. Remember CAM 2 race fuel. It allowed the motor to run cooler.less friction more hp plus do you think nascar would use it if it wasn't beneficial...
NASCAR is using it because they got paid to use it. Purely marketing and $$$. Same with IndyCar. Brazil is a big producer and a big sponsor, so the series switched to Ethanol.
 
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2014 | 04:55 PM
  #14  
2500hdon37s's Avatar
2500hdon37s
Stellar HDF Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,155
Likes: 1,728
From: Mid-MO
Default

Just put in 93 and be done with it.

I already put premium in my truck because of the increased compression, bike manual suggests 91 or higher. Just put it in and move on. It's only about a dollar more per fill up on these bikes.
 
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2014 | 06:38 PM
  #15  
JonGolden's Avatar
JonGolden
Thread Starter
|
Road Captain
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 523
Likes: 1
From: Charleston, SC
Default

Thanks for the suggestions. I appreciate it.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lemayco
Touring Models
18
May 16, 2021 10:03 AM
shoemaker
EVO
20
Jul 24, 2012 05:46 AM
mang0
Exhaust System Topics
3
Jun 21, 2012 12:17 PM
harleyhusker
General Harley Davidson Chat
2
Jun 8, 2008 07:45 AM
relli
Touring Models
3
Jun 2, 2008 05:27 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:42 PM.