When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
On the most part these units seem to give little problems. One thing that did come to mind was that in constant rpms there is little strain on the sprockets and chain. Most of the time I don't crack the throttle for downshifting to 5th 4th and 3rd as they seem to drop in nicely anyway. For 2nd and especially 1st I do crack and downshift for a soother result. Will this shorten the life of the balancer sprockets and chain, in particular the sprocket on the crank? Ron
My understanding is that the counter balancers are fine until the engine is built up and the rev limit changed. At higher rpm's, like wot racing,eg,drag race,they are likely to fail. I'm curious to hear what our more knowlegeable members have to say.
If you can imagine a half a beer can sliced top to bottom then filled up wih lead. Mount roller bearings on the end and then spin it!
The pressure on the bearings goes up in a very steep curve. The following numbers are for ilustrative puposses only.
The pressure on the bearings @ 2k rpm is equal to 2, @ 4krpm is equal to 6 @ 6krpm is equal to 12 and any thing higher is equal to boom! Hence the rev limiter.
Before any body gets real technical the preceeding was juat an example to make a point. So to make H.P. in a counter balanced motor you make it bigger a non counter balanced motor can be made to spin faster and produce more H.P. just by virtue of higher RPM.
I'm not a big fan of the counterbalanced engine in a Harley or anything else. I've had several Porsche 951's (944 turbos) that use a counterbalanced motor. They tended to have a resonance vibration at certain rpms , and I've noticed my Harley has it too, especially since I changed bars; it seems the new bars have ampified it to my hands a bit more. I rode a bud's SE110 Electra Glide a couple of weeks ago and while it did vibrate pretty hard at idle, it was much smoother than my softail under throttle. It seems the softails vibrate more as you twist the throttle; the harder you get on it, the more it vibrates. I don't know whythe MoCo doesn't go ahead and make a common motor for all it's big twin models.
First a non counter balanced motor rigidly mounted would vibrate the livin sh*t out of you and there is no room in the softtail frame to put in a rubber mount. Secondly you can install neoprene riser mounting washers (available from HD) to reduce vibration in your bars.
First a non counter balanced motor rigidly mounted would vibrate the livin sh*t out of you and there is no room in the softtail frame to put in a rubber mount. Secondly you can install neoprene riser mounting washers (available from HD) to reduce vibration in your bars.
Last time I checked my drawers there wasn't anything in 'em except me. My Evo Sloptail vibrates some. But it is solid mount, and it is an HD.
I wonder if there is an upper limit to the weight that can be hung off the transmission? A Softail's swingarm is considerably heavier than a Dyna or barge swingarm.
mojojones: Trust me, my last bikes were knuckles and pans. These counter balancers are wonderful. Agreed, they won't cover the whole rpm range but within normal highway speeds it's a comfy ride. rockerhead: Understand how they work and the rpm limits to keep them from grenading, but I was working a different angle. Cam chains for example are fairly lightly loaded once the engine starts as the time frame between opening and closing spaces is quite short. The balancer chain, and sprockets are again lightly loaded at a constant rpm but see the most load on the drive components with rapid throttle response and decel. The weights themselves create the resistance to motion. In your opinion, will cracking the throttle needlessly like we all do downshifting have a negitive effect on the life span of the sprockets and chain due to the rapid load imposed on the weights or is it a none issue? What brought all this up was I was looking in the service manual at the setup and by the picture, the crank sprocket has very few teeth in contact with the chain and would seem to be the weak link. It's one of those, shouldn't last but seem to give little problems things. Ron
Well it seems that the moco felt that going to a roller chain in 07 would reduce the wear index as there is a larger contact area over a regular chain. However the "b" motor has been around long enouh to not be really affected by throttle blipping, so rev her up!
Thanks rockerhead. I agree the roller chain is a better choice for both balancer and cams as well and hydraulic tensioners. I will continue to do what feels good and trust the design. Like you said, it's been around for a long time with few problems. Ron
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.