Fuel crossover diameter
Thread Starter
|
Cruiser
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 241
Likes: 1
From: NYC
Cruiser
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 175
Likes: 1
From: Lake Panasoffkee, FL
Mine is 1/4" ID and I don't think I've ever seen a fuel pump on a bike and if you got rid of it how would the gas get to the other side? I'm not sure about newer model bikes. I have a 94, 95 and 2000. Just a note. I have never had to pull a tank so maybe a waste of money.
Last edited by Panasoffkee; Nov 15, 2009 at 08:40 PM.
Club Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,327
Likes: 1
From: South Jersey
Just about any engine work or getting at the electrics under their requires removing the tank. Sometimes you can get by with just lifting it a little and propping it up. With the quick disconnect it just makes that part of the process clean and quick. Even changing the bars can require the tank removal to get at the throttle lines or wiring or just to make it easier.
If you're paying a shop to do the work then you might also be saving money since that's less time to work on it.
If you're paying a shop to do the work then you might also be saving money since that's less time to work on it.
Thread Starter
|
Cruiser
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 241
Likes: 1
From: NYC
I did some more research and the diameter is for a fact 5/16". Is it a waste of money, to some maybe, but not for me. I do all of my own work and I'm also planning to do some electrical wiring and it would make things much easier. Thanks for all of your help.
Cruiser
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
From: Livingson, Texas
gas crossover
Well I want to put a quick disconnect fuel crossover on my bike and was wondering what the correct diameter is? The choices are 1/4", 5/16", and 3/8". Also, this might be a dumb question but is the crossover necessary? I know it connects the two halves of the gas tank up front, but the fuel pump is in the back (I think), so the fuel will get to it the same, regardless if it's there or not. I'm thinking it just allows the fuel gauge to give an accurate reading. If that's the case, then I could get rid of it entirely. Well that's just a thought. Your help is appreciated.
Club Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,582
Likes: 72
From: North East
[quote=Theo;5854361]I did some more research and the diameter is for a fact 5/16". Is it a waste of money, to some maybe, but not for me. I do all of my own work and I'm also planning to do some electrical wiring and it would make things much easier.[quote]
Theo: Did you ever purchase and install the quick connect in the fuel cross over line? Which clamps did you use? Any issues I should be aware of?
Theo: Did you ever purchase and install the quick connect in the fuel cross over line? Which clamps did you use? Any issues I should be aware of?
Thread Starter
|
Cruiser
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 241
Likes: 1
From: NYC
-Theo
Elite HDF Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,928
Likes: 1
From: Desert S. West
Another option is simply a brass ****** splicer and two hemostats. Cheaper and less chance of a leak but not as convenient.
Me. I'll stick with the coupling's. I do take my tanks off often enough to make it worthwhile to have the coupling in the crossover tube.
I've already done it to my bagger and there was plenty of room but I'm seeing the Softail is a bit tighter. Just means it's more important to do it on the Softy than the bagger.
Me. I'll stick with the coupling's. I do take my tanks off often enough to make it worthwhile to have the coupling in the crossover tube.
I've already done it to my bagger and there was plenty of room but I'm seeing the Softail is a bit tighter. Just means it's more important to do it on the Softy than the bagger.
Last edited by BoomerBob; Jan 9, 2010 at 12:24 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
UrbanRunner
General Harley Davidson Chat
35
Feb 18, 2018 05:35 PM
