When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Was trying to locate a rear reflector for my 2013 Sportster 72. Looked up the part number: 68724-07. Ordered it from the dealer along with the reflector. Every photo or video of this bike Ive seen shows a square reflector and matching square black housing. I know the Canadian part is a different part number and its square too, oddly enough. Not sure why the one I got is rounded. Anybody know why?
pics for reference:
What I should have, with squared off edges What I have, with rounded off mounting plate edges
Possibly a superseded part number if the square ones are not available any more.
Do the part numbers match exactly? Usually a superseded part number will have extra digits like a -2 after the old part number.
Also gotta ask, why would you want either of those on there anyway, looks like you have a beautiful paint job and neither reflector complements it.
Possibly a superseded part number if the square ones are not available any more.
Do the part numbers match exactly? Usually a superseded part number will have extra digits like a -2 after the old part number.
Also gotta ask, why would you want either of those on there anyway, looks like you have a beautiful paint job and neither reflector complements it.
Part number is an exact match and I was also thinking that the MoCo might of made a revised version that could fit well on multiple model bikes. Wasnt after complimenting the paint, which is a factory color. Just wanted more visibility back there without adding lights.
On my 2018 Iron, I tought it looked like poopie, caught dirt. I took it and the ft fork refectors & the gay looking useless "fairing" off before I even rode the bike, Regards "Big E"
$14? I wonder how many of those they ever sell? Considering that almost everyone ditches their reflectors immediately. That was Mod #1 on my bike 29 years ago.
$14? I wonder how many of those they ever sell? Considering that almost everyone ditches their reflectors immediately. That was Mod #1 on my bike 29 years ago.
John
^+1, I have seen a few people on here that had to put them back on for approval to access a military base but other than that no way.
I put a LED light strip on the back of mine for extra visibility after removing the taillight and going with the run/stop/turn conversion, just didn't trust the texters to notice just the signals lighting up as brake lights.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.
Reflector issue...
