When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I'm running +2 over tubes with a 4" preload spacer in those pics, in total forks are 2.75" longer than stock. I kept the stock kickstand, no issues. I think if you went +4 or +6 over on the front you'd def want a longer kickstand.
+2 over barely effects riding quality in any noticeable way. It does feel slightly more stable at cruising/highway speeds, and trails better in a straight line. Turning and maneuverability is just as fine as stock, I live in a pretty big city and have no issue getting around and lane splitting. I've ridden a buddy's bike who is running +4 over, same thing there, barely effects ride quality.
But I agree with the recommendation above to use the longer damper tubes & get the benefit of more suspension travel....
good luck,
T.
You wouldn't need longer damper tubes if PVC spacers are used. PVC spacers are the standard option with these fork extension kits, like the ones TC Bros sells. Basically it's a schedule 80 (very dense/hard) piece of PVC tube placed inside the fork tubes at the top between the springs and the fork caps. It preserves stock suspension travel providing the spacer is the same length as the tube extension, i/e: 2" spacer with +2" tubes preserves stock travel.
What's everyone's thoughts on the safety of these longer damper set ups? I've been considering the tracker die as well. I'm concerned there may be some structural loss by extending the forks tubes further out than they are meant to be. I'd prob go +3 as I went +3 taller rears. I replaced the steel fender with a fiberglass shorty but run a superbrace.
... on the safety of these longer damper set ups? ...
You mean just longer damper rods, keeping all else equal? That's exactly how the MoCo achieves different frontend heights among different models. For example the frontend of my 2007 XL1200L sits lower because it has shorter damper rods compared to the 2007 XL1200R.
You mean just longer damper rods, keeping all else equal? That's exactly how the MoCo achieves different frontend heights among different models. For example the frontend of my 2007 XL1200L sits lower because it has shorter damper rods compared to the 2007 XL1200R.
But do the different models have different length fork tubes? For example I have a nightster which sits low. Something like a roadster sits a few inches higher. I just assumed the different models had different length forks?
But do the different models have different length fork tubes? For example I have a nightster which sits low. Something like a roadster sits a few inches higher. I just assumed the different models had different length forks?
No. the externals are the same. I have a Low, which sits lower than a nightster. Then I replaced the damper rods with the ones that come stock on the Roadster and whammo... my
Low is now tall like a Roadster.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.