When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Went to my favorite dealer yesterday and got to take a 08 Nightster out on a ride. This particular one was orange/black and while it looked pretty cool, I would probably opt for sliver/black denim. Anyway, the bike was an absolute blast to ride. I had it out for about 20 minutes and was really enjoyed it. If I had to describe it in one word it would be...raw. The bike just felt pure. It was surprisingly quick too. I guess I am just used to Softails whick are porky by comparison. I also noticed how nimble the bike felt. I suppose the rake is steeper than the 32 deg on the Softails. The bike has a lot of character too. Even though it is rubber mounted you still felt the engine. There was no doubt you were on a v-twin.
Things I would probably change....
Obviously, the stock pipes are pathetic. So, an air cleaner, pipes, race tuner would be first. I would retain the mid controls but add some type of forward foot pegs for stretching out a little. I also wouldn't mind a little more suspension. Not sure if the stock shocks are adjustable so I need to check this out first. The bike would look great with a set of 12" black apes. I would probably add a tach too.
A couple of questions:
Anyone know what size the rear shocks are? How do they compare with the shock length on the Custom? Has anyone changed the fork springs?
I still haven't decided if I am going to get one yet. My short list:
Nightster
2006 1200R
2003 1200C
I need to ride the 03 before making a decision. Can anyone here comment on how they might compare and what I should look for? I know the 03 is hard mounted but it is also about 60 lbs. lighter.
My dad has a 2007 1200L--looked at the 1200R and 1200C too--he's jealous now of my Nightster.
"If I had to describe it in one word it would be...raw."--you gotit, and quick too[8D]. Regarding the drawbacks you stated, yep, added new pipes and seat, with SE AC andSERT going on in 50 miles--I'll call itgood. And I'm with you on the mids--like them, but may put something on my crashbars for a hwy stretch.
My dad has a 2007 1200L--looked at the 1200R and 1200C too--he's jealous now of my Nightster.
"If I had to describe it in one word it would be...raw."--you gotit, and quick too[8D]. Regarding the drawbacks you stated, yep, added new pipes and seat, with SE AC andSERT going on in 50 miles--I'll call itgood. And I'm with you on the mids--like them, but may put something on my crashbars for a hwy stretch.
Good luck!
Crashbars!!!???!!! On a Nightster!!!??? Arrgghhhh!!!!!
I put the HD forward highway setup on, and kept the mids. Works OK, especially as the bike is actually THE MAMA's, though I ride it more often.
The Nightster is a neat bike. To me there is only one problem with it. It is too single purpose. What I mean by that is that it is definetly a "bad boy" type of bike and to add any accessories to broaden its range would be a shame. I need a bike that I cancarry stuff in like tire plug kit, compressor, registration, etc.(saddle bags). Also I need to load up and take off one 3 - 5 day overnighters (saddle bags and windshield). As cool as the Nightster is that in itself narrows the bikes purpose down to little more than a bar hopper. I know there is always the acception and a few people on this forum have bags, etc on the Nightster but I think that's trying to make a cool bike into something it's not. I have the 1200 C.
My dad has a 2007 1200L--looked at the 1200R and 1200C too--he's jealous now of my Nightster.
"If I had to describe it in one word it would be...raw."--you gotit, and quick too[8D]. Regarding the drawbacks you stated, yep, added new pipes and seat, with SE AC andSERT going on in 50 miles--I'll call itgood. And I'm with you on the mids--like them, but may put something on my crashbars for a hwy stretch.
Good luck!
Crashbars!!!???!!! On a Nightster!!!??? Arrgghhhh!!!!!
I put the HD forward highway setup on, and kept the mids. Works OK, especially as the bike is actually THE MAMA's, though I ride it more often.
Pardon you, but my black engine guard is sleek, smooth, and veryyy sexy[sm=smarty.gif]! And if it saves my custom paint one dayI'll give it a big fat kiss[sm=kiss.gif]!
Now, about the HD forward highway set up on your nightster--pics possibly, oh opinioned one?
They are 11" shocks and they really suck. Adjustable, but they still suck. The fronts are even worse, standard 883 components. 2 guys on XLforum are suspension experts and have many suggestions based on rider weight. I'm 190lbs and I always bottom the fronts out. (I do a lot of hard city riding) Hitting bumps/dips etc on I95 can be quite unerving at times... I had a 1200Low and that rode MUCH BETTER than the 1200N. (and people told me the 1200L rode like crap before I bought it)
Me? Im getting Progressives front and back. If I get a 50% improvement over stock Ill be happy...and Im sure the Progressive set will do that for me.
I put progressive on the front and rear of my bike. With 11 inch shocks you get very little travel=crappy ride, but I like to feel the rode... The 412 progressives on the rear gave a little improvement. I noticed the biggest change in ride quality when I installed the progressive springs in the front.
When I ride my dads XLC I feel like I am on a couch compared to my nightester, but I wouldn't trade it for the world.
The Nightster is a neat bike. To me there is only one problem with it. It is too single purpose. What I mean by that is that it is definetly a "bad boy" type of bike and to add any accessories to broaden its range would be a shame. I need a bike that I cancarry stuff in like tire plug kit, compressor, registration, etc.(saddle bags). Also I need to load up and take off one 3 - 5 day overnighters (saddle bags and windshield). As cool as the Nightster is that in itself narrows the bikes purpose down to little more than a bar hopper. I know there is always the acception and a few people on this forum have bags, etc on the Nightster but I think that's trying to make a cool bike into something it's not. I have the 1200 C.
I understand your point. I still have my Softail with detachable windshield/bags etc for touring. If I buy a Sporty I will do some shorter weekend solo trips on it. Even with the Nightster, a detachable shield and a detachable sissy bar to hold a t-bag is all I would need. I probably would not put any bags on it. The nice thing about the t-bag and detachable sissy bar is they pop right off after you get camp set up or get to the hotel. I do this same thing with my Softail and even the bags on it. But as I say, I will probably not add any bags. The t-bags hold enough for any of my trips. In fact, I don't even use the top roll...just the main bag.
Having said all of that, I still haven't ruled out the 1200C model. If I go with the 1200C, I will have the same set up for weekend solo trips. A t-bag/sissy bar and a detachable windshield.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.