When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Y'all can do whatever you want, but I refuse to ever put another pair of Dunlop tires on my bike again. They're absolutely rubbish compared to other tires. Especially the Commander II tires.
Y'all can do whatever you want, but I refuse to ever put another pair of Dunlop tires on my bike again. They're absolutely rubbish compared to other tires. Especially the Commander II tires.
The problem with this statement, as frequently seen here on the forum, is that many people don't seem to know the difference between a tire manufacturer and a tire model.
While the Dunlop 401 is a poor performing tire IMO, the Dunlop E3 performs well and the difference between it and the 401 is like night and day.
Michelin also has its share of lousy tire models as well.
The problem with this statement, as frequently seen here on the forum, is that many people don't seem to know the difference between a tire manufacturer and a tire model.
While the Dunlop 401 is a poor performing tire IMO, the Dunlop E3 performs well and the difference between it and the 401 is like night and day.
Michelin also has its share of lousy tire models as well.
Here is the 18,650 mile tire in question, as you can see it is not worn more in the center than on the sides and there is no chalk. The rear 401 has no chalk on it nor up inside the fender. Maybe if the tire got to be 16 years old there might be some chalk from degradation but I doubt it. That chalk thing is obviously from a fertile and wild imagination.
A fertile wild imagination does not wear tires out in 8939 miles.
I have no doubt the 401s I ran would also have made it 19,000 miles. What I do doubt is I would ever ride my bike in such a way to make them last that long. Further validating my observation.
My rear D401 lasted ~23k miles, and my front ~26k miles. I ride in all kinds of conditions at varying intensity. I think the biggest thing is keeping up on tire pressure for your conditions. That seems to be the biggest reason for low mileage I've seen.
Had these tires for a year. I ride hard and have 12.5k on the rear...have about 4-5k left till I'll get a new rear. Great tires for the price. Great overall. Biggest difference from stock was in the turns. Night and day difference for me.
Same here. I am an aggressive rider and also ride two up alot. I have 12K+ on the rear with no issues. When its toast I will buy another.
And I am meticulous about the TP, I never leave home without checking it. One thing I'll say about Commander II is that at 30 psi it appears to be underflated, so much so that it squeaks and squeals when I move it around on the tile floor in my shop. I run it at 32, whether that's good, bad, or doesn't matter I dunno yet.
I have a dyna and run my pressures at 40-42 rear and 30-32 front. Mine also squeaks on my garage floor since it shines like a new penny from being power troweled. No squeaking on road pavement though. I am a fan of the CMDRII's. To each their own. Its your bike put what you like on it. My cool aint your cool so be cool.
And I am meticulous about the TP, I never leave home without checking it. One thing I'll say about Commander II is that at 30 psi it appears to be underflated, so much so that it squeaks and squeals when I move it around on the tile floor in my shop. I run it at 32, whether that's good, bad, or doesn't matter I dunno yet.
I have collected various tire manufacturer's inflation recommendations for their tires when specifically mounted on a Sporty. The one I haven't been able to find yet is the Commander II's.
But based on the commander II's construction and sidewall characteristics, I suspect the proper inflation psi will be close the the Dunlop E3 and Metzeler 880's which are shown below.
I'd start with them at, 38-40 Rear and 38-40 Front.
Thanks cHarley, I did some searching and all I found was a vague suggestion to use the stock Dunlop pressure. I blocked my bike up near verticle and then got down on the floor and it was obvious that the foot print of the CII was longer and the sides bulged slightly more than the 401 which suggested to me that the CII has a softer carcass.
Harley-Davidson Fat Boy Becomes a Dark, Decepticon-Inspired Custom
Slideshow: Killer Custom's latest build relies on styling changes rather than performance upgrades, giving the cruiser an entirely different personality.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.