When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I ride an 2001 Electricglide Classic; currently have screaming eagle air kit, power commander and rhnehart true dual exhaust installed. For a winter project to improve power I am considering installing Wiseco flat top 95" pistons and a set of Andrew 21G gear drive cams. I believe this conversion does it's best work at normal road speeds. It has a much wider power band than stock and can pass a truck with a mere twist of the wrist-- there's no need to downshift. Useful power starts at a lower rpm and remains far higher than stock all the way to redline, with no loss of reliability and drivability is better than stock.-any opinions or feedback?
I don't know...$2000 to $3000 for an additional 7 cubic inches? In my opinion, Harley's should be 95 c.i. or even 103 c.i. right out of the box and getting us to pay that much for basic performance upgrades is highway robbery...especially when you consider that a Rocket III from Triumph sells for $15,900 and comes with 140+ horsepower and 140 lbs. of torque!
It is robbery....but.....we buy it! Good ole free enterprise.....If no one would buy ad on's from Harley maybe they would be more competitive [8D]
If I owned Harley I would do the same thing!!!! Why not? If people are buying your price is not to high!
[sm=sorry.gif]
I ride an 2001 Electricglide Classic; currently have screaming eagle air kit, power commander and rhnehart true dual exhaust installed. For a winter project to improve power I am considering installing Wiseco flat top 95" pistons and a set of Andrew 21G gear drive cams. I believe this conversion does it's best work at normal road speeds. It has a much wider power band than stock and can pass a truck with a mere twist of the wrist-- there's no need to downshift. Useful power starts at a lower rpm and remains far higher than stock all the way to redline, with no loss of reliability and drivability is better than stock.-any opinions or feedback?
Have you ever thought about just adding cams to your current setup?
It seems a little strange to me that so many people do the 95â upgrade without trying to upgrade the 88â they have. It seems everyone wants a 95â with a hot cam and some headwork. Well why not add cams to your 88â and have some headwork done? Everyone seems to want to throw half of the engine away and replace it to get from 1450cc to 1550cc. I could understand it more if you where going from 1450 to something like 1800 - 2000cc, but for just a 100cc and a few horsepower? Why wouldnât you add the exhaust, SERT, SE air filter (all of which you would already need for the 95â build) and a cam and now how much of a difference is a dealer SE 95â build got on you? Could more compression be added to the 88â and still be reliable? Maybe when you have the heads off you could install new gaskets for some more compression as well. Iâm new to Harleys so maybe I just donât understand yet.
The first dyno sheet is from faribaulthd.com. This is a dealer here in Minnesota. I looked up an old thread from a guy who had his stage I done to his 88â at this dealership. The stage I added 8HP and 8TQ. Below is what Faribault HD said they could do with a cam.
âThe dyno guy at the dealer is also the service manager and showed me some other dyno results after a stage 1 and Andrews 37 cams. He said he could get me another 10 hp and another 10 in torque for $500. The price includes the cams, lifters, labor and dyno tuning.â
The last dyno sheet if for a 95â stage II and it's taken right out of the current Screaming Eagle online catalog.
I read that article also and confirmed with someone I trust that the article is a good mod. I bought a set of used cyclinders and just sent them off to Wiesco. My guy is doing the package mid November. I'll post results.
Gary
It seems a little strange to me that so many people do the 95â upgrade without trying to upgrade the 88â they have.
I did upgrade mine at 88 inches and ran it for 25000 miles before going to 95 inches ran great but it always felt like it was fighting to get enough air .since I bumped it up to 95 inches the motor feels like it isn't working near as hard to pump air the reason they didn't begin with 95 inches is because of epa and noise considerations
I don't know Steve, there are a lot bigger engines out there than the Harley twin cam. Seems like 1700's or so are becoming the norm. Don't you think Harley needs to bump up to the 1550 as standard fare in the next couple of years to keep up. I'll bet they do, maybe next year. I'd like to see that happen along with the 6 speed.
Gary
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.