'09 vs 2015
Every painted part comes off, and can be replaced with NEW Vivid Black parts.
My old boss did that.... and IIRC, sold his tins for way more than he paid for the new black ones.
My advice, do NOT test ride a '15 unless you are sure you want to buy.
I traded my 11 Ultra with a 107 in on my 14 SGS. The numbers don't really translate to real world use. My stock SGS would easily run with my 107. With some very minor changes (pipes, tune, A/C) the new 103 can put out more power yet.
As far as 103 vs 107 vs 110 - we're not talking a lot of difference. It really comes down to what was done to enhance performance on each bike.
I traded my 11 Ultra with a 107 in on my 14 SGS. The numbers don't really translate to real world use. My stock SGS would easily run with my 107. With some very minor changes (pipes, tune, A/C) the new 103 can put out more power yet.
As far as 103 vs 107 vs 110 - we're not talking a lot of difference. It really comes down to what was done to enhance performance on each bike.
Bottom line... I need to take one of the new bikes for a ride. I'd like to take one of the 110's for a ride also, just to compare.
I thought their policy, well I know it WAS, you could go in and demo any bike on the floor...
No need to wait for a demo day.
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
And some dealers owners ride "dealer" bikes (their toy without paying for it) that maybe available for an extended test ride. I personally would not buy a bike without a test ride. And not just around the block.
Bottom line... I need to take one of the new bikes for a ride. I'd like to take one of the 110's for a ride also, just to compare.
But to answer your questions - there was definitely a difference in how the power was delivered between the 103 and the 107. My 107 had more low end grunt. The 103 was happiest above 2500 RPMs. When I 1st rode the SGS, I described it as a Honda Davidson - which wasn't an insult. It was smoother than my 107 and revved more freely. I really enjoyed running it up to 5500 RPMs and didn't really feel a sharp power curve drop off. In fact, the motor was so smooth (and quiet with the stock exhaust) that sometimes I had to peek at the tach to shift.
So in the end, it's just different, and imo, better. And remember what I said - power delivery is just one aspect of the many changes made. That Infotainment system wasn't a selling point to me at all. But now that I have it, I love it. Anyway, I did the math on what I would need to do to improve my 11 Ultra to approximate the performance of the Rushmore bike vs the trade in difference vs the resale value of each bike 3 or 4 years down the road. The suspension work alone was enough to abandon the idea of upgrading the Ultra further, and my decision was made.
As far as power of the 103 vs 110 - HP = 103" 76.40HP 90.20TQ VS
110" 84.80HP 98.94TQ
This is from Fuel Moto dyno runs on stock bikes.
I would submit that, depending on the bike, those numbers can vary and that a strong 103 will be very close to a weak 110. Regardless, with some simple tuning, both will run faster and stronger and the difference between the 2 after tune will be minimal in the real world, and less than the numbers might indicate. A simple rider weight differential could even the 2 out.
In other words, I wouldn't buy a 110 bike for more power. I would buy it because it's a CVO and has all the options.






