103 stage 2 thoughts/opinions
Harley Davidson now sells 110 bolt on cylinder & piston kit, Part # 92500039, for 07 and later
Twin Cam Engines. That and your cam preference should make a good Stage-II out of any TC-96.
As the old Hot Rod guys use to say "Speed cost money, How Fast Can You Afford To Go"
Twin Cam Engines. That and your cam preference should make a good Stage-II out of any TC-96.
As the old Hot Rod guys use to say "Speed cost money, How Fast Can You Afford To Go"
Cruiser
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 245
Likes: 30
From: Newcastle, California
I am doing this very same kit.I ordered it last week, my local dealer had a special 20% off parts, so I bought it. I am having them install it on Wednesday. I am adding comp releases. I also ordered a PC 5 from fuel moto, with a map for it.
Road Master
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 817
Likes: 26
From: PA
rough averages I've found from different dyno runs on the web:
103 CUBIC INCH WITH WOOD PERFORMANCE 222 CAMS
SET UP HP TORQUE
96 STOCK 65 75
96 STAGE 1 75 85
96 WITH 222 CAMS 85 100
103 STAGE 1 80 90
SE 110 STAGE 1 90 110
103 WITH 222 CAMS 95 110
Im putting in the 103 big bore kit with the Wood Performance 222 cams right now. Don't know if I'll get these dyno tuned numbers but I'm sure better than the dog cams on my 96 ci now. Btw, it looked to me that the 204 cams numbers were pretty close to these 222 cams. They were back ordered three weeks from HD plus buying the 222 cams from Fuel Moto, I'll get a matching tune for my Power Vision which might help.
Your results may vary. Past performance cannot predict future results.
103 CUBIC INCH WITH WOOD PERFORMANCE 222 CAMS
SET UP HP TORQUE
96 STOCK 65 75
96 STAGE 1 75 85
96 WITH 222 CAMS 85 100
103 STAGE 1 80 90
SE 110 STAGE 1 90 110
103 WITH 222 CAMS 95 110
Im putting in the 103 big bore kit with the Wood Performance 222 cams right now. Don't know if I'll get these dyno tuned numbers but I'm sure better than the dog cams on my 96 ci now. Btw, it looked to me that the 204 cams numbers were pretty close to these 222 cams. They were back ordered three weeks from HD plus buying the 222 cams from Fuel Moto, I'll get a matching tune for my Power Vision which might help.
Your results may vary. Past performance cannot predict future results.
Last edited by beammeup; Dec 15, 2015 at 09:55 PM.
Ultimate HDF Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,899
Likes: 3,412
From: OH
The HD 110 kit from what I have seen is a dog without swapping out cams and some other minor changes. A 107 with a decent cam and exhaust will smoke the off the shelf package. There are a few builders to choose from to get you there for probably less than you would pay for the kit from Harley.
Cruiser
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 245
Likes: 30
From: Newcastle, California
Well up date, I had my 103 kit installed and the pc v . I had the chance to ride it. So Saturday I rode it 200 miles.I rode some freeway, some town and mostly mountain roads. Well I can say , it pulls a lot harder up hill , more power from a stop light.So far I am happy with it. They told me not to go over 3000 rpm for the first 500 miles.I know I could get more HP with different cams, but for now this is good.
Grand HDF Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,808
Likes: 285
From: Green Country Oklahoma
Both our 07 and 08 UC had SE Stage II 103 kits power was more then adequate, solo fully loaded regardless head winds or uphill those bikes were more powerful then our 15 Rushmores . Make sure get the ACR or your starter or comp is going take a dump often.Both bikes were very solid performers and very reliable which IMO is important for long distance rides.
Tourer
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 339
Likes: 199
From: NE PA
When I bought my 2010 FLHX I had the dealer do the 103 Stage 2 before I took delivery. I was really pleased with it and it ran well for the 5 years I owned the bike. Never a lick of trouble.
Here's the dyno sheet:
I will say the '15 at stage 1 feels a little snappier on the butt dyno.
Here's the dyno sheet:
I will say the '15 at stage 1 feels a little snappier on the butt dyno.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
