When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
From: i live outside Omaha Ne on the Iowa side in the Loes hills, some great places to ride
Disapointed Dyno #'s
guys i listened well, paid the money out. and don't think i have very good results.
i have a 2007 SG had 103 big bore kits with SE 10.5-1 pistons, SE CNC heads , SERT, Reinhart true duals, and just before dyno had TW-400 cams installed. was hoping for 100 + HP
got 97 HP and 103 TQ.
does my tuner have a conservative dyno?
Do i not have a good tuner?
or do just a select few get over 100?
NO you should be over 100 on both #'s
Aside from the numbers are you happy with how the bike runs??
Dyno's seem to vary a great deal?? It seems that how it reads out depends a lot on the operator?
I had mine done 3 times over three years and got a different reading everytime?
I just posted a thread here for the first time tonight....I have a 95" and I'm getting 100 & 100 or so the machine says? I lost the crankdue to a cam chain tensioner failure so I'm thinking of bumping it up but I'm not sure it's worth the $2K for 6 or 7 hp?
I know there are others here on the board that have SE 103" setups that have seen 115/115 from a good build and solid tune, butnote that SE has a few head castings to choose from and some flow better than others, especially with domed pistons. Exhaust is another culprit that robs both torque and power. Many people go and get into a decent build only to give up as much as 6% to 8% by using true duals over a 2 into 1 pipe. If you really want every ounce of power out of your build, buy a D&D Fat Cat and tune your bike with a Daytona Twin Tec or Thundermax Tuner. That will wake it up and is much better than a mediocre tune using a SERT. Just some food for thought!
Have you tested your ccp? If not, I would get a compression tester and check it out. I have heard of people finding the '07's have the pistons down the hole quite a bit. If your builder did not attempt to get the squish set right, you are probably not running the compression you think. This would lead to lower than expected numbers. You would need to trim the bottom of the cylinders to get the piston to a zero deck height and then use a .030 - .040 head gasket for ideal squish.
Your AFR on your dyno sheet could probably be better. I would think your parts combo would have given higher numbers. Putting a 2-1 pipe on would probably get your numbers a little higher, but I think there is other issues going on. Check your ccp and report back. There is lots of good help here.
From: i live outside Omaha Ne on the Iowa side in the Loes hills, some great places to ride
RE: Disapointed Dyno #'s
so what you are saying Biggzed is to check the compression pressure?
i need to take out both spark plugs and test one cylinder and then the other right?
guys i listened well, paid the money out. and don't think i have very good results.
i have a 2007 SG had 103 big bore kits with SE 10.5-1 pistons, SE CNC heads , SERT, Reinhart true duals, and just before dyno had TW-400 cams installed. was hoping for 100 + HP
got 97 HP and 103 TQ.
does my tuner have a conservative dyno?
Do i not have a good tuner?
or do just a select few get over 100?
I would say it's your heads holding you back. You can get a much better head by having your stock ones ported/polished and having them cc'ed and milled to bump up the compression just a bit. Everything else in your build looks good, and if you fix the heads you'll be doing OK.
Well go find a dyno that will give you the numbers that will make you happy. Like has been said before dynos vary greatly from one to another. I'm not sure how you would know which one or if any of them are truely accurate. It shouldn't really matter anyway.The only thing adyno is good for is to measure a starting point and test for better or worse results depending on parts added and removed and tuning adjustments. Dyno numbers are onlymeaningful relative to subsequent number given by that same dyno.
so what you are saying Biggzed is to check the compression pressure?
i need to take out both spark plugs and test one cylinder and then the other right?
Yep, that's what I am saying. Take out both plugs, install the tester in one cylinder. Hold the throttle open while you hit the starter button. Let it crank over 3 - 4 times, the needle should max out. I think your reading should be around 180 - 190 lbs. There is a calculator somewhere online that will figure it exactly but you need to know the chamber volume of your heads to make it work. Do you happen to have that (or the part number of the heads)?
I would agree with Maine Ultra that your heads could be holding you back, but without knowing if your compression is optimized for your cams I wouldn't start swapping parts. A test is cheap and easy to do.
From: i live outside Omaha Ne on the Iowa side in the Loes hills, some great places to ride
RE: Disapointed Dyno #'s
OK we all have busy lives so this took me some time.
i rounded up a compression tester, and did the test.
i got 170 on the rear cylinder and 170-175 on the front cylinder.
16925-02B is the cylinder head part # from Harley Davidson
so now what?
OK we all have busy lives so this took me some time.
i rounded up a compression tester, and did the test.
i got 170 on the rear cylinder and 170-175 on the front cylinder.
16925-02B is the cylinder head part # from Harley Davidson
so now what?
Do you know what thickness head gasket was used? I'm thinking there is not enough compression. I am very curious as to what is going on here, because I am also considering using the same cams in my 103" build that I am planning. I sent this thread to a friend of mine that is a really good HD wrench. He'll get back to me in a day or two. Hang in there, you'll get to the bottom of this. Get back to you in a couple of days at the most.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.