When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
OK - I get this is all based on pure perception with little hard data to back it up however - seeing as how I am thinking about trading in my Heritage for a touring model sometime next year - I have noticed something that may mean absolutely nothing but I thought I would get some opinions ....
When searching the dealers in Wisconsin for pre-owned bikes - I generally see more RGs/SGs than I do RKs up for sale. I have been looking for the past 3 months or so so not a whole lot of time to draw any conclusions but it is fairly consistent so far.
Now I know that this may completely wrong and I also know that if this is accurate - it could simply mean riders of the RGs/SGs are trading up for more substantial bikes. Or it could mean - RK riders are more content with their rides.
Not meaning to start an argument as I know there is a ton of passion around why we ride the bikes we ride - just wanted to get some personal insight from the touring group on what I am seeing in the pre-owned market.
More RG/SG are sold than Kings, and Road King owners are more secure in their choice of bike. More sold means more for sale and King owners are Die Hards.
More RG/SG are sold than Kings, and Road King owners are more secure in their choice of bike. More sold means more for sale and King owners are Die Hards.
Right, plus, whats a more substantial bike than a Road Glide? They arent making Boss Hogs any more.
I'm certainly content. Versatility was also a factor in deciding. Take the windshield off and it's a fine cruiser. Add a detachable TP, fairing, and lowers and the King makes for a great fully dressed tourer. I ride a different bike with any combination of those pieces and that big shiny nacelle looks pretty good too.
I'm another vote for "no fairing"... Road Kings also change very little over the model history, while RG/SG seem to get more feature updates...considering they have more bells and whistles to mess with in the first place. Also fairing guys seem to be drawn to switch or experiment with the shark nose vs batwing from time to time whereas RKs are just simple bikes as they've always been.
I also see more RG/SG owners being the type that trade in on more of a regular schedule almost like car owners. For some its a high mileage thing, but for others it feels more like a generic vehicle clock in their head...3 - 5 years...time for a new bike...I don't see that with Dyna, Softail, Sporty or RK owners. Those bikes tend to engender some kind of ownership bond it seems. Maybe the extra body work makes it feel more like an appliance? No insult to RG/SG. Great bikes and I know guys love them, but they do seem to trade in more frequently, often for another RG or SG.
Last edited by Thingfish; Nov 14, 2016 at 05:16 PM.
All of the above pretty much sums it up, for me at least. I have an FLSTN and an SERK. I prefer to ride the "King". They call it the King , I believe , because,in my opinion, it is. I hope that you will feel the same way after you ride one.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.