When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Have any documentation on that claim, or is it just your opinion? I'm pretty sure it's there to keep the engine cool and not the rider. It just so happens that lower temps are good for the rider.
Crabchuck; You were on another thread " For Steve Cole and other Gurus" in which Steve stated in post #6 The EITMS was a rider comfort feature. You stated after that post basically the same thing as here. So,where is your proof it is there to keep engine cool. I tend to go with Steve since he has more experience on these engines. Also the sales literature on the Rushmores and M8 listed the EITMS as a rider comfort option.
Crabchuck; You were on another thread " For Steve Cole and other Gurus" in which Steve stated in post #6 The EITMS was a rider comfort feature. You stated after that post basically the same thing as here. So,where is your proof it is there to keep engine cool. I tend to go with Steve since he has more experience on these engines. Also the sales literature on the Rushmores and M8 listed the EITMS as a rider comfort option.
Current literature says the rear cylinder becomes an air pump helping to cool the engine. Cool the engine, not the rider.
Current literature says the rear cylinder becomes an air pump helping to cool the engine. Cool the engine, not the rider.
Cooler engine means the rider isnt feeling the heat while sitting in traffic. Cant it do both? I never understand why this always becomes a pissing match between people. Who cares that much?
Cooler engine means the rider isnt feeling the heat while sitting in traffic. Cant it do both? I never understand why this always becomes a pissing match between people. Who cares that much?
This only becomes a pissing match in your eyes. Members replying to this post are stating their opinion,might be right,might be wrong,but again I don't see where you get a pissing match out of it. So go find a thread you can post something positive.
Current literature says the rear cylinder becomes an air pump helping to cool the engine. Cool the engine, not the rider.
I agree that the rear cyl. becomes a air pump when the fuel is shut off to it, thus making the cyl. cooler and also the rear exhaust header cooler,thus giving rider more comfort from the engine heat that was radiating from pipe,but like I stated in a earlier post,I haven't really noticed much difference if its on or off in the heat on my last 5 bikes that had it.
This only becomes a pissing match in your eyes. Members replying to this post are stating their opinion,might be right,might be wrong,but again I don't see where you get a pissing match out of it. So go find a thread you can post something positive.
The OP asked what to expect. Theres 3 people now going back and forth on whether EITMS was made for the rider comfort or for cooling the engine. Neither opinion of which is what the OP asked for. Seems like the perfect place to post what I did because this isnt the first time an EITMS thread has gone this way. If you feel every post has to be positive, I suggest you go to the top corner of the forum and click on Log Out.
I agree that the rear cyl. becomes a air pump when the fuel is shut off to it, thus making the cyl. cooler and also the rear exhaust header cooler,thus giving rider more comfort from the engine heat that was radiating from pipe,but like I stated in a earlier post,I haven't really noticed much difference if its on or off in the heat on my last 5 bikes that had it.
That's why my opinion is that it's for the engine. The difference really isn't perceivable by the rider, but it is measurable on the engine. Same reason they put the oil cooling circuit in the head. Air cooled engines have always had heat problems when they're not moving. The system is even called "engine idle temperature". To me it's pretty clear they're trying to deal with the problem of heat in an air cooled engine.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.