Buzz Kill

You're gonna love the bike, no worries. Most of us have never had any problems. As has been said, many of the problems you read about on the forum are a result of modifications. There are thousands of possible modification combinations available, and it's unlikely that you're going to get it bang on the money without a little research, so folks have glitches, they come here to get 'em fixed, once fixed they're so damn happy with the bike they go riding and don't post the results. If you track down one of the Honda cage forums, where guys are tearing into their engines and changing everything out, and hooking up their computers to do remaps on the fly, working to make a 4 banger competitive with a v8...you'll see lots of issues. But those guys aren't dumping all that money into those cars because it's a cheap product, and neither are HD owners.
I own a Sportster, bought it hopped on it, rode it about 6 thousand miles in a trip, then changed the oil. Never had any issues with the bike. I now have a Street Glide on order, but I'm keeping the Sporty. I like HD.
JamieWG,
Critical thinking when applied to consumerism requires that we question the motivations behind changes in the products we buy. There are a multitude of reasons that a company might choose to make changes in their product line, and profit will ALWAYS be a consideration.
The MoCo is out to make money, and I have no objection to this, more power to 'em, and they can have some of mine. It is historically demonstrable that manufacturers use cost-cutting formulas to maximize profit, and they factor in numerous considerations when making those decisions, one of which is the expected life of the product. The are two ways to do long term R&D: do extensive in house testing and research, finalize a product with real world testing to it's maximum forseeable lifespan, release the final product...and pass the cost of research on to the consumer. Or, do in house testing and research, get a finished product with a reasonable success rate and calculated lifespan, pass it on to the consumer with a good faith gurantee to resolve any issues that arise. Most companies go with the latter. Including pharmaceutical companies.
As critical thinkers, it is reasonable to assess the changes, determine the possible motivations, and make judgements about the result. Much of the technical wrangling on this and other HD sites is a result of these judgements, so we see a lot of people questioning the MoCo. As is proper, question your government as well, they DON'T know what's good for you. And, just like politics, some of us are going to fall on different sides of the issues. Some folks think everything post-Ironhead was a mistake. Cool, no issues here, but I don't have one. The mistake would be that people who spend so much time on this forum are here just to bash HD. We have the extremes on either end, sure, but most of us are just after some truth.
By the by, I am NOT an engineer. But I don't think that just because someone IS an engineer they're inherently smarter than I am. I've corrected too many engineering mistakes to believe that.
Thanks, all, sorry about the novel. Enjoy the ride!

I’m responding to validate your skepticisms. These problems with HD and their motor bikes make all of us at times wonder of the MoCo’s decisions/intensions/motivations/agenda. HD is a business, which makes business decisions. (period) Maybe we expect too much from a company which by their own choosing or not has become a national icon, an American Icon.
BUT…
I’m puzzled why you are using this forum to convince yourself of your decision while you wait for delivery. I believe you researched Harley-Davidson and specifically the Ultra Classic. Hey, That’s >20K+ we are talking about for a UC. Why do you want to buy a HD? If you answered that question you probably would not be having cold feet right now or you wouldn’t be investing into the HD lifestyle. Good luck.
The only way you will not be happy with the Ultra is if you like sportier bikes like an FJR 1300. Which is one of the best sport tourers made. And if you read some forums they are full of people with problems. Such as extreme engine heat, and a mysterious ticking noise in about 1 out of 6 of them.
Only real gripe on mine is my wife has a hard time getting on the back. She is going to have to do some yoga or something. But when she gets on there she is all smiles. Other than that Im going to throw an oil cooler on her (the bike, not the wife) in March and I will be good to go. But I have done that on all my Harleys due to living in the south.
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
Not to sound negative, but after reading all the different post about the Harley's, it seems logical to be skeptical about buying this motorcycle. It's depressing to say the least. Sounds like a crap shoot as to whether you’re going to get a decent problem free bike.
Everything from losing electrical power, oil leaks, mixtures not adjusted properly, and a slew of others horror/mechanical problems listed in this forum. Why would someone buy this brand?
I am days away from picking up my '06 UC and a bit worried about the reliability of this machine. As a consumer spending 20K+, shouldn't I expect a gem?






