When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I've been caught up in the on going discussion about changing over to true duals, and the controversy about the loss of torque caused by the loss of back pressure when true duals are installed on a bagger. If the back pressure/torque gain is so significant with stock bagger pipes, then why don't owners of Dynas, Soft Tails & Sportys change over to the system that the MOCO puts on baggers as stock equipment? Wouldn't they gain from such a change over?
Bottom line is, are we baggers making a big deal over nothing, or are the owners of the "other" Harleys missing out?
Not so much on bacpressure as it is more on scavaging. The stock dyna and softails have this small crossover tube between exhaust that helps. Not sure if the stock sporties have this crossover pipe but I am sure the do. It is removed when drag pipes or most any aftermarket pipe is installed With a slip on pipe, the crossover stays. So it is in some sort the same as the bagger system.
Not so much on bacpressure as it is more on scavaging. The stock dyna and softails have this small crossover tube between exhaust that helps. Not sure if the stock sporties have this crossover pipe but I am sure the do. It is removed when drag pipes or most any aftermarket pipe is installed With a slip on pipe, the crossover stays. So it is in some sort the same as the bagger system.
^^^ this is more in the right direction. Scavanging and velocity inside the pipe helps the engine breath better. over sized primary pipes and true duals slow down the velocity and kills off low end power.
the Dynas and Softys are lighter and the effects of a true dual or drag pipe style pipe are deminished on these bikes. and alot of people cam there bikes bigger and have alot more compresion with these bikes, so tuning is different.
My butt dyno isn't sensitive enough to notice a difference; I did Rinehart TD's and an SE a/c at the same time, but I couldn't tell you that right off idle there was any difference; above 2000 or so there was a big improvement, however.
I've been caught up in the on going discussion about changing over to true duals, and the controversy about the loss of torque caused by the loss of back pressure when true duals are installed on a bagger. If the back pressure/torque gain is so significant with stock bagger pipes, then why don't owners of Dynas, Soft Tails & Sportys change over to the system that the MOCO puts on baggers as stock equipment? Wouldn't they gain from such a change over?
Bottom line is, are we baggers making a big deal over nothing, or are the owners of the "other" Harleys missing out?
LOOKS, is why they don't change on Sporty's etc. Not performance.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.