08 Swing Arm
PM Dawg and he can compare the part nos. for the two years.
I've been investigating using the parts from an '07 or '08 SE Road King on my '04 EG in order to use a 180 rear tire.
Yesterday, I compared the '08 Touring model rear frame parts to the '07 SE RK parts. The PN for the '08 Touring model swing arm ("Rear Fork" in Harley-speak) is 47549-02A--the "02A" suggests it would be the same for an '07.
The rear fork/swingarm on the SE RK is a painted part so it's a different PN, however, the rear fork shaft (that goes through the swingarm to attach to the frame), is the same part no. as used on the '08, as are all of the bearings, spacers, etc. So, I'd conclude the swingarms are the same for '07 and '08 Touring models.
But PM Dawg or check the parts books at the dealer.
P.S. Why do you ask?
Rick
ANS: NO
I've been investigating using the parts from an '07 or '08 SE Road King on my '04 EG in order to use a 180 rear tire.
ANS> The 2009 is the first year of the 180mm/4.75" X 15 rim. There is some strength issues between 2002 to 2006 addressed but nothing external.
I'm doing a swing arm conversion for a friend on his 00 RK. I have what I have been told is a 08 swingarm
ANS> when converting over the swing arm you will need to address the 5/8" trans/pivot shaft and the bearing on the swingarm. The trans is a different casting (<2001 & the 2002> with the larger round gusseting around the pivot shaft housing in the latter. You should not bore. I use this solution.
but the axle which is 25mm seems a little sloppy
ANS> This should not be
ANS: NO
I've been investigating using the parts from an '07 or '08 SE Road King on my '04 EG in order to use a 180 rear tire.
ANS> The 2009 is the first year of the 180mm/4.75" X 15 rim. There is some strength issues between 2002 to 2006 addressed but nothing external.
I'm doing a swing arm conversion for a friend on his 00 RK. I have what I have been told is a 08 swingarm
ANS> when converting over the swing arm you will need to address the 5/8" trans/pivot shaft and the bearing on the swingarm. The trans is a different casting (<2001 & the 2002> with the larger round gusseting around the pivot shaft housing in the latter. You should not bore. I use this solution.
but the axle which is 25mm seems a little sloppy
ANS> This should not be
I was told elsewhere the only difference in the tranny castings was the size of the swing arm pivot hole and these have been drilled successfully using a drill with a 1" long 5/8" pilot. Now you have me wondering.
Rick
I was told elsewhere the only difference in the tranny castings was the size of the swing arm pivot hole and these have been drilled successfully using a drill with a 1" long 5/8" pilot. Now you have me wondering.
Rick
Q> Any idea when the switch on the axle size was made?
ANS> A rear 1" bagger was from 2002 to 2007. The 2008~current had a 25mm. As far as I can see the 2008 has the same physical looking swingarm as a 2002 (not internally as it is different).
I would not recommend drilling your trans as verse to honing with an actual machine. Your clearance is a slip fit and drills tend to wander and you can never get the slip fit tolerance with a drill. You would need an milling machine. Consult an actual machinist, one who knows what they are doing for basic metal and machining principles.
The next problem is the cases are designed differently as there is more material on the tans mount. Measure your "rings" than measure the newer 2002~current model. If there was a need for HD to modify the trans molds HD would have to do it. If HD could sell the earlier trans housing with a 3/4" hole without spending extra money, what would your take in this line of thought?
I have a trans housing with an early PN with a 3/4" trans/swingrm hole I'll sell you cheap. It is only slightly used, as the back 1/2 of the mount is broken off and missing. I had no part in the modification, just R&R the trans for a customer.
The conversion kit requires no drilling and it also addresses the "Rear Steer" problem without a stabilizer while at it.
In closing I might suggest you doing what you feel is right for you. The most important thing is for YOU to do your own research, use common sense, and make up your own mind without someone telling you what to do.
Last edited by FastHarley; Oct 4, 2008 at 06:37 PM.
The next problem is the cases are designed differently as there is more material on the tans mount. Measure your "rings" than measure the newer 2002~current model. If there was a need for HD to modify the trans molds HD would have to do it. If HD could sell the earlier trans housing with a 3/4" hole without spending extra money, what would your take in this line of thought?
Thanks,
Rick
Trending Topics
So.... Is there a diference in the rear fork on the two models or is it just a paint coding thing? The numbers are different not just the post fix lettering as other HD painted part PN's indicate.
I may get the wheel and try it... then the rear fork, sprocket and axle later if it dont work. If that dont work Punt!!!!! The Metzeler 160/70 B17 is .55" wider that the stock MU85 tire and .16" wider than the Metzeler 150/80 B16 if I remember right.
Also for those who have thought about it the 2009 SERG rear bags are unprotected in primer and carry PN 90768-09 (left) and PN 90788-09 (right) dealer had no price or computer listing as of tonight. The latch covers carry 90674-09 (left) and 90680-09 (right) same deal no price or computer listing yet. These PN's are out of the parts catalogs in the parts department.
Tt
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders




