When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Here is a photo of the dyno run I had on Sat. To say the least I am very dissapointed. The bike feels like it runs alot better than before the cam swap, but the results are only +6hp and +5tq over what harley states as stock. I should have had better #'s than this just by adding the PC-V. I am also suprised at how "rough" the tq curve is. I was really bummed when a buddies 09 softail with V&H shortshots (no baffles), SE heavy breather, and a Thundermax pulled 75hp and 90tq right after my run. His graph is so smooth and flat. He pulled 90 ft lbs from 3000-4500.
The print out didnt give AFR's as the sniffer was not registering any data.
It was not a dyno tune, just a one time rip. Our dealer was giving free dyno runs at an open house.
Temp 70.19, humidity 30%, SAE 1.01, 4th gear RO
I bought the PC-V from fuel moto, and the map installed is from Jamie, and is supposed to be for my current set up.
I definatley need to talk to Fuel Moto tommorrow and get this running better. It stumbles off the line and you can feel the stumble at 2500, pulls good above 3500 but that is not where I want to spend alot of time.
I was really hoping for a nice wide smooth increase in torque. I will be happy with 80 hp 95 tq.
From everything I have read about fuel moto, they should be able to get me set up right. If not I have to decide if I want to spend the money on the autotune or get a full dyno tune locally.
Here is a photo of the dyno run I had on Sat. To say the least I am very dissapointed. The bike feels like it runs alot better than before the cam swap, but the results are only +6hp and +5tq over what harley states as stock. I should have had better #'s than this just by adding the PC-V. I am also suprised at how "rough" the tq curve is. I was really bummed when a buddies 09 softail with V&H shortshots (no baffles), SE heavy breather, and a Thundermax pulled 75hp and 90tq right after my run. His graph is so smooth and flat. He pulled 90 ft lbs from 3000-4500.
Something must be wrong with your set up. My bike has about the say numbers as your buddies and only have the PCV, Stg 1 AC with FatCat. I rated 78.9 Hp and 90.8 TQ.
How much bump if any would I obtain from a 255 cam?
How much bump if any would I obtain from a 255 cam?
Like I mentioned earlier, my buttometer says 4-5HP and 6TQ. It is tested accurate to ą1HP and 1TQ . The curve feels about the same in slope, i.e. nice and flat like a rolling hill, only it has moved up. My guess is no loss from idle-2300 and maybe a tad better, stronger from 2300 on up, with the best gains at 2500-4500 RPM. Power levels off at 5K and starts to drop off slowly at 5500 up to the redline. Again, it is not a peak-HP cam set and shouldn't be chosen for that. My bike is an otherwise stock TC96 with Fuel Moto Power Package (PCV-AT, AC, DT JP's).
I've seen several TC96/255 dyno charts (two posted in an earlier reply) and the top two were about 84HP and 100TQ, one with RHTD's, with the TQ peak at around 3600. Another one charted 80HP/95TQ with Bub TD's, but that's on the low side. One can't speculate on the state of tune of any of these, although I think the top two are about as good as you'll get with a stock engine.
An update on my cam install. I sent Jamie a copy of my dyno sheet and spoke with him on Wed. As we all know, they were moving on Thurs so he asked if he could get me straight next week. Not a problem. He said he could get rid of my low end stumble and help out the MPG (37mpg). I attribute my poor numbers and rough graph to the fact that if I jumped on the throttle, the clutch would break loose and the RPMs would jump way up but the bike would not gain speed. Proof to me that the 255's were making some real good TQ. Makes sense now. My butt dyno told me that the cam upgrade made a nice increase in TQ when I rolled on the throttle. The dyno run was at WOT and if it broke the clutch loose then it surely would not registar good numbers or a smooth graph. So, today I installed the SE high performance clutch diaphram that comes with the SE 103 stage 2 kit. No more slipping at WOT. Now it pulls nice and steady all the way up. The bike should be near perfect once Jamie gets the low end stumble taken care of.
Here is a photo of the dyno run I had on Sat. To say the least I am very dissapointed. The bike feels like it runs alot better than before the cam swap, but the results are only +6hp and +5tq over what harley states as stock. I should have had better #'s than this just by adding the PC-V. I am also suprised at how "rough" the tq curve is. I was really bummed when a buddies 09 softail with V&H shortshots (no baffles), SE heavy breather, and a Thundermax pulled 75hp and 90tq right after my run. His graph is so smooth and flat. He pulled 90 ft lbs from 3000-4500.
Didn't you mention that you have a soft clutch earlier? You can feel it in 6th gear but the bike may be feeling it in all gears.
Something is amiss with that jumpy curve, clutch or timing maybe.
An update on my cam install. I sent Jamie a copy of my dyno sheet and spoke with him on Wed. As we all know, they were moving on Thurs so he asked if he could get me straight next week. Not a problem. He said he could get rid of my low end stumble and help out the MPG (37mpg). I attribute my poor numbers and rough graph to the fact that if I jumped on the throttle, the clutch would break loose and the RPMs would jump way up but the bike would not gain speed. Proof to me that the 255's were making some real good TQ. Makes sense now. My butt dyno told me that the cam upgrade made a nice increase in TQ when I rolled on the throttle. The dyno run was at WOT and if it broke the clutch loose then it surely would not registar good numbers or a smooth graph. So, today I installed the SE high performance clutch diaphram that comes with the SE 103 stage 2 kit. No more slipping at WOT. Now it pulls nice and steady all the way up. The bike should be near perfect once Jamie gets the low end stumble taken care of.
Cool...I figured as much, just didn't read the entire thread before I opened my yap.
An update on my cam install. I sent Jamie a copy of my dyno sheet and spoke with him on Wed. As we all know, they were moving on Thurs so he asked if he could get me straight next week. Not a problem. He said he could get rid of my low end stumble and help out the MPG (37mpg). I attribute my poor numbers and rough graph to the fact that if I jumped on the throttle, the clutch would break loose and the RPMs would jump way up but the bike would not gain speed. Proof to me that the 255's were making some real good TQ. Makes sense now. My butt dyno told me that the cam upgrade made a nice increase in TQ when I rolled on the throttle. The dyno run was at WOT and if it broke the clutch loose then it surely would not registar good numbers or a smooth graph. So, today I installed the SE high performance clutch diaphram that comes with the SE 103 stage 2 kit. No more slipping at WOT. Now it pulls nice and steady all the way up. The bike should be near perfect once Jamie gets the low end stumble taken care of.
I hope I don't have a clutch problem like you had. So far so good with the stock setup. How hard was it to install the Stage 2 diaphragm and how much harder is it now to disengage the clutch?
Drain fluid, remove heel shifter, remove floor board, remove outer primary cover, then remove the 6 bolts that hold the diaphram and swap out the stock for the SE. Reassemble everything and add fluid. I was able to reuse my primary cover gasket, saved me $35. I also switched back to HD Formula 1 fluid in the primary. Between the two, no more slippage. I could tell as soon as I opened up the derby cover I had toasted the fluid. Man did it stink.
The clutch lever is harder to pull in now, thats for sure. Feels as stiff as my wifes sporty if that helps at all.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.