When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I would not buy another touring bike unless it had ABS. It is not something you can add later and there is no reason not to get it if you are buying a new scoot. My '09 Ultra has ABS and I have used it on several occasions and I know that I would not have avoided at least one collision if it were not for the ABS.
You can add it later.
IMHO ABS is BS... I have it on my 2010 and it's just another tool The "Man" uses to keep me from hurting myself. I have tested it and I feel I can react to any situation as well as it can. in fact, I believe it will hinder my ability to avoid troubble in some situations. Case in point. I hit a pot hole near a stop sign with the rear brake on and when the tire came back down and made contact with the road the ABS kicked in and allowed the bike to roll past the point I wanted the bike to stop.
Don't get me wrong I think ABS is a good thing 99.9% of the time But, I would never trust it over my ability to control my motorcycle. just my .02.
I would never buy another bike without it if it was offered. Whatever drawbacks I have heard and experienced about ABS, there are so many positives that far outweigh the negatives. The biggest is that it can literally save your a** when you least expect it.
For the last 28 years of riding I never had ABS or needed it. Maybe in the future when all bikes are required to have it I will try it out. But till then I will ride defensively and use common sense. I do have ABS on my truck because it was standard equipment, but haven't stopped or locked up the breaks to use it either - but I guess it is there in case it thinks I need it.
I just bought an '09 Road King. It was the only one they had left and simply I was ready to get a bike to replace my '07 SG. It had no ABS. I guess for ME it fell into the "nice to have" category...but not a deal-breaker at all. I am 100% comfortable not having it.
It's not that after 20 years riding I feel that I am somehow 'better' than the technology by any means. But I must admit...something just seems a little "wrong" putting such stuff on these bikes...not sure why...just kinda felt like down deep (like airbags on a bike - yeah...they can save your life in a catastrophic incident but I still wouldn't want em on my bike). Irrational, yeah...but kinda like flying an old Swift taildragger...you KNOW the technology is not there...and you FEEL everything...and there is a hell of lot more risk...and for ME, that's whole point.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.