Do all true duals kill torque?
All true duals hurt TQ. on other wise stock motors, Anybody tells you different is fooling theirself or don't know what their talking about, Some of the loss can be made up by adding other power adders like free flowing air filters, PC-3's and so on. True dual setups lower backpressure and lower backpressure kills Tq. And yes you will feel it.

That is with the new '06 Rineharts with the stock baffles, Ness Big Sucker, PCIIIusb, and stock motor.
Here is a quote from HeadQuarter's website -
" NEWS FLASH!!!! John’s Performance in Washington state gets 92.4 HP and 96.4 foot pounds of torque from a stock 88 cubic inch 2006 Street Glide using a Head Quarters HQ-0034 bolt in cam, Power Commander and Rhinehart Tru-Duals. Great work John!! "
I don't see any mention of torque loss there either.
Steve
All true duals hurt TQ. on other wise stock motors, Anybody tells you different is fooling theirself or don't know what their talking about, Some of the loss can be made up by adding other power adders like free flowing air filters, PC-3's and so on. True dual setups lower backpressure and lower backpressure kills Tq. And yes you will feel it.

That is with the new '06 Rineharts with the stock baffles, Ness Big Sucker, PCIIIusb, and stock motor.
Here is a quote from HeadQuarter's website -
" NEWS FLASH!!!! John’s Performance in Washington state gets 92.4 HP and 96.4 foot pounds of torque from a stock 88 cubic inch 2006 Street Glide using a Head Quarters HQ-0034 bolt in cam, Power Commander and Rhinehart Tru-Duals. Great work John!! "
I don't see any mention of torque loss there either.
Steve
Everbody at the local HD shop who has ridden "Flash" like the setup and performance for a daily rider. I'm not lookin' for 100 hp right now anyway. I did have the same apprehentions about swapping out the headers as you. I'm glad I made the change.
Just like your wife's comment, with 100 degree temps my legs were fryin' in slower traffic. Doesn't seem to be as big an issue now.
I just called Bub and talked to Ken in tech support for 10 minutes and asked a bunch of questions regarding the old design, the new design, what was different etc...
He explained the new design has a baffle with a chamber in it to make more backpressure than the "old" style baffle. On a stock 88 and even a 95" motor they did see a dramatic DIP on the dyno sheets. They now have a performance baffle as well as a quiet baffle. He suggested to get the quiet baffle. You'll see an increase in trq, but about a 4hp peak loss at 5k rpm but more than make up for it on the bottom end according to him.
These threads are always so interesting to read. It is always the same people saying the same thing.
Well, except for me
I like the SE slipons...if I end up getting more complaints though as the weather gets hotter I will look at going to another setup. I plan on doing some motor work over the winter so it wouldn't be a bad thing either.
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
http://www.jpcycles.com/productgroup.aspx?GID=4E36C90B-6CD3-46D2-B057-8C2DEED4A43C&brand=porker
or Milwaukee Twins "Power Cones". (#4400180)
http://www.jpcycles.com/productgroup.aspx?GID=610273E4-5658-4B32-A935-33E6DED0F6FB&brand=milwaukeetwins
They fit into the motor end of the header and are supposed to create back pressure that is lost when installing a freer flowing exhaust sytem, "Improving torque, throttle response and horsepower". I don't know anyone who has used them, so I can't say whether they really make a difference or not. It would be interesting to hear from anyone who is or has used them. Anybody?


