When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
i was considering removing it from my 08 sg, but the bike is black, so powdercoating the wrap around rail black would make it disappear, as the chrome one does stick out like a sore thumb. it is there for a reason, i'm sure that it does have some structural effect with tying the upper rear ends of the frame together. i can see how it may detract from the handling, so this winter i'll just get mine powdercoated black.
I have removed the rear license mount rail on my 2002 Road King and 2008 Standard and have had no problems with either bike handling wise or structurally.
Well, I'm no structural engineer... Having said that, those frame horns look to me as though they're home to the upper shock mounts, which are supporting the entire weight of the rear of the bike, and are secured to the frame at one end and the (effectively rubber mounted) swing arm at the other. I could see where there would be some pretty significant torsional loads on those horns. Since metal fatigue wouldn't happen in a day, I guess I was most worried about what it would do to the frame over the long-term, say 10 years or more, which is why I always left mine on there.
Plus, it's hard for me to see why Harley would spend the money to put the bar on thousands (millions?) of bikes if it actually had no purpose, and/or why they waited until the '09+ frame re-design to get rid of it.
Well, I'm no structural engineer... Having said that, those frame horns look to me as though they're home to the upper shock mounts, which are supporting the entire weight of the rear of the bike, and are secured to the frame at one end and the (effectively rubber mounted) swing arm at the other. I could see where there would be some pretty significant torsional loads on those horns. Since metal fatigue wouldn't happen in a day, I guess I was most worried about what it would do to the frame over the long-term, say 10 years or more, which is why I always left mine on there.
Plus, it's hard for me to see why Harley would spend the money to put the bar on thousands (millions?) of bikes if it actually had no purpose, and/or why they waited until the '09+ frame re-design to get rid of it.
Jeff
Thank you! Why would HD spend money on something that isn't neccessary.
i was considering removing it from my 08 sg, but the bike is black, so powdercoating the wrap around rail black would make it disappear, as the chrome one does stick out like a sore thumb. it is there for a reason, i'm sure that it does have some structural effect with tying the upper rear ends of the frame together. i can see how it may detract from the handling, so this winter i'll just get mine powdercoated black.
Removed mine and replaced with Auto Gems Shotgun lights. Looks great and I added more lights in the process. Almost 10,000 miles and no problems at all.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.