When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Looking at the specs of the SE204 it would seem that with a 4* adv key bringing the intake close back to 30* that it may be a good choice for the stock TC96" baggers?
The 204 really is a cam that likes a little bump in compression to perform the best. If you want basically the same results on a bone stock engine, go with the 203, Andrews 21 or HQ500 and you wont even have to think about the advance key. Why try to make something work that wasn't designed for the application?
Here's my thoghts,
If you pull the cam plate, put gear driven cams in with a 4 degree advance gear. You won't have any more cam chain adjuster maintanance ever again. On the other hand, will you really see a benifit to your low end torque with a 4 degree advance on a low lift cam? You will loose miles per gallon just to gain maybe 10 more ft lbs of torque.
I've been down this road and found something much better. If you are curious, I will write more. Any way, hope that helps.
Here's my thoghts,
If you pull the cam plate, put gear driven cams in with a 4 degree advance gear. You won't have any more cam chain adjuster maintanance ever again. On the other hand, will you really see a benifit to your low end torque with a 4 degree advance on a low lift cam? You will loose miles per gallon just to gain maybe 10 more ft lbs of torque.
I've been down this road and found something much better. If you are curious, I will write more. Any way, hope that helps.
Please write more I am interested in any information on this subject there is nothing better than experience and I am sure a whole slew of combinations have been experimented with.
senior experienced all-knowing leader of the unwise
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 351
From: USA
I don't think they would be so good in a stock compression bike. There are better choices. Now I have SE 204's in a 103" engine with 10.1 compression and i couldn't be happier with it. I freely admit my cam choice was not based on extensive research and comparison but instead by the fact that i paid $100 for them new off ebay and i was pretty sure they would work just fine.
A friend of mine works at the local shop and he did most of there dyno testing. He told me to get the 204's with true duals, air cleaner and tuner. He will be installing them for me soon.
The 204 really is a cam that likes a little bump in compression to perform the best. If you want basically the same results on a bone stock engine, go with the 203, Andrews 21 or HQ500 and you wont even have to think about the advance key. Why try to make something work that wasn't designed for the application?
Dalton, thanks for the advice - I didn't realise it needed a bit more compression.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.