When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
well with all this talk about the different cams going on I just had to ask this. IF I do a 110 kit with some head work and a projected compresion ratio of 10.25:1, will the 255 work or do i need to look at somthing different. the 255 come with the kit but that is only 9.5:1???? by the way it's going in a heavy *** bagger that I usually ride 2-up.
Last edited by capman98; Nov 2, 2009 at 06:52 PM.
Reason: more info
take a look at any dyno chart. you'll see that the hp and torque cross at 5250 rpm. my thoughts are that a comfortable cam that places emphasis on fat low through midrange cam profiles would be a good choice. sure, you can get more horsepower etc, with higher lifts, longer durations, but are likely to sacrifice real world usable power. looks like the 255's and 54's both achieve that. there are surely others, and "big boyz" heads has a great chart describing cam grinds. there is some valuable information there too.
Good post, but it also illustrates a point that somebody else brought up. Riders habits. If the rider likes to blast the rev limiter once in a while, he will likely be dissapointed in the 255. If the rider has no interest in high rpm "playtime", then either of the two that you mentioned will satisfy him.
This is important to think about, considering the effort involved in building the motor. Get ready to "play" and find dissapointment? NOT an option.
You are leaving out the HQ500 cam, I put one in last winter and it flat turned my bike into a running machine, 90HP and 93LBS of torque, best investment I have made in my bike so far and I've invested a lot!!!!!!!!!
You are leaving out the HQ500 cam, I put one in last winter and it flat turned my bike into a running machine, 90HP and 93LBS of torque, best investment I have made in my bike so far and I've invested a lot!!!!!!!!!
With an intake close of 36* (I think) the HQ500 cam might not give the best low end TQ - which incidently is what the OP is asking for since it is a 2-up touring bike.
I considered this setup 'til I read this thread and started corresponding with the OP. I ended up buying the OP's used 255's based on his comments and those I had gleaned in the past two years reading forums and talking to tech support from various cam mfrs. In that period I did talk to Bob Wood more than once and he was very helpful but didn't try to sell me on something inappropriate for my needs. Rather than spend $525 for the 6-6's w/+4° gear I spent $110 instead on the 255's, as my interest is in performance below 4k RPM. I considered the dyno charts posted by the OP of that thread as nearly worthless since the tuner didn't start the pull 'til 3k RPM, and 2-3k RPM is a region that's very important to me. "
Iclick, I agree that the 255 is a decent cam for low end TQ on a heavy touring bike etc..... but despite what the Andrews tech guy said, the 21 and the 26 will work very well in a touring bike - I have seen many dyno charts that have demonstrated a lovely TQ curve from 2000rpm right to 5000+rpm.
I have a question for you, did you consider the Crane cams in your quest for the right cam? The HTC-300-2 grind has nice specs for a touring bike - 33* intake close, 226 duration, 27* overlap, .505 lift. I would like to hear your thoughts on this.
Last edited by thewholehog; Nov 3, 2009 at 01:08 AM.
I'm in the same boat
I've narrowed my choice to the 21 or 255 also.
I might go to 103" maybe.
Seems a lot of people have the 255's and like them.
I would really like to see a dyno sheet and a write up on the 21's.
So, my vote goes to the Andrews 21's.
I think they would give a decent boost in torque,
and make a great all-around cam.
I'm in the same boat
I've narrowed my choice to the 21 or 255 also.
I might go to 103" maybe.
Seems a lot of people have the 255's and like them.
I would really like to see a dyno sheet and a write up on the 21's.
So, my vote goes to the Andrews 21's.
I think they would give a decent boost in torque,
and make a great all-around cam.
If you go with the 21s I'd be interested to see the dyno chart.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.