255 cams without doing the 103? comments please
If your only adding a cam for a bump in performance, not building the highest HP or TQ engine, and don't have access to, or don't want to pay for, a good tuner with a Dyno the PC-V will do an adequate job. It may not produce the best possible numbers but adequate.
If you have access to a good tuner, and maybe a bit more money, the TTS of SEST would do a better job and allow you to get the most out of your build.
Now I just have to decide which way I want to go.
George
Here are some points I'd like your take on:
1. I would like to know why Alpha-N is such degrading quality when it is much apart of both systems.
2. Do you still think the MAP sensor is dead or weakened when a PCx is installed?
3. Do you think TTS/SERT is providing better feedback for AFR management than PCV with Auto-Tune? If so, explain why.
4. You spoke of a "three-dimensional" quality to the way TTS/SEST works. Considering the PCx does use the MAP and other on-board sensors just as TTS/SEST does, why would the PCx not be the same? Using that same logic why wouldn't the PCV-AT be four-dimensional with its full-range O2-sensing capability?
5. The point of tuning is to get the proper pulse-width and spark at the right time. Why does TTS/SEST do a better job than a PCV with or without AT since both use the same fundamental setup (stock ECM)? All the PCx does is alter AFR's and timing based on a dyno tune by adding an additional hardware component. TTS/SEST is doing the same thing except that the manipulation is internal to the ECM.
Thanks.
Last edited by iclick; Dec 28, 2009 at 11:59 PM.
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
Terry
HDF Admin




