When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
From my perspective, comparing my 07 UC 96" w/Stage 1, Tune & Rinehart pipes vs. my 09 UC 103" Stage III, Tune & BUB 7 TD's, the average fuel mileage 'to date' is 1.8 mpg lower, and that I attribute to some bad fuel over a course of 5 weeks (was going to some stations that I 'thought' had good fuel based on past experience).
The overall average for my 09 UC is currently: 44.56 mpg. I have had a high mpg of: 56.58 and a low mpg of: 34.22
I generally always have my tour-pak full and the saddlebags at 50% full, riding solo for 70% of the time.
56.58mpg!!!! you must have been dropping off Loveland Pass!...lol
You are looking at it all wrong. MPG is not a functioin of engine size. As others have said, it is the tune (AFR) in the part throttle cruise range and how much you use the extra power. If your build is sound and tuned properly your MPG can be exactly the same under the same conditions.
Most of the variables in MPG that you will hear about come from the PCIII or PCV off-the-shelf maps. They are set (conservatively) slightly rich for the safety and liability reasons. At part throttle settings the bike will feel more responsive in the low 13's AFR but your MPG's will be in the mid 30's. If your AFR's are set to mid 14's for the cruise range you be in the low to mid 40's MPG.
Well those certainly are impressive numbers but I still don't get the logic. I built my old muscle cars to have power. Why? To use that new power. Mpg was never a factor in my decisions when I wanted to build bigger. Going faster was. To each their own I guess.
I would bet that you never took off on any cross country trips in your muscle cars. I know I never did. But when you are riding on a road like Hiway 2 from Broken Bow to Alliance Nebraska where it's about 200 with no fuel stops...
I promise you will be concerned with mileage.
When I got to Alliance I put 5.8 gallons in my 6 gallon tank!
At some point I am going to mod the motor on my '08 SG but I will want to make it as efficient as possible.
Well those certainly are impressive numbers but I still don't get the logic. I built my old muscle cars to have power. Why? To use that new power. Mpg was never a factor in my decisions when I wanted to build bigger. Going faster was. To each their own I guess.
My guess is gas was less than $3.00 a gallon when you were doing this.
I would bet that you never took off on any cross country trips in your muscle cars. I know I never did. But when you are riding on a road like Hiway 2 from Broken Bow to Alliance Nebraska where it's about 200 with no fuel stops...
I promise you will be concerned with mileage.
When I got to Alliance I put 5.8 gallons in my 6 gallon tank!
At some point I am going to mod the motor on my '08 SG but I will want to make it as efficient as possible.
You would be correct with that bet. My trips were stop light to stop light and a 1/4 mile. Does that count???
You probably don't don't ride very far, or do any real touring.
Mileage is critical to the number of miles (range) before getting gas. Not an issue of $$, but a real issue if you ride in areas where you don't really know where the next gas sation is.
Originally Posted by confederate
Why would one who is considering a big bore kit be concerned with mpg???
You probably don't don't ride very far, or do any real touring.
Mileage is critical to the number of miles (range) before getting gas. Not an issue of $$, but a real issue if you ride in areas where you don't really know where the next gas sation is.
I've done plenty and still do plenty of trips to rallys and places elsewhere, so I'll disregard your off base comment there greg. In most cases, there is usually some sort of fuel station within 125 - 150 miles. If there is not, I adjust my route accordingly and pay attention to my odometer. My previously comment in this thread was simple, if I want to do engine mods whether it be to a car or bike, I personally couldn't care less about mileage, I do it for performance/power. Others may have different opinions, these are mine. Now tell me greg, since you are the expert here, just what is real touring???
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.