2012 torque

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jul 20, 2011 | 12:40 PM

5windows

Thread Starter

Stage I

Joined: Jul 2011

Posts: 1

Likes: 0

From: newport tn

2012 torque

Do the 2012 103 engine have more torque then the 2011

Jul 20, 2011 | 01:38 PM

ringer19

Cruiser

Joined: Mar 2010

Posts: 125

Likes: 0

From: Ontario Canada

Hope so cause the 2011's are turds until you spend some $$ on them

Jul 20, 2011 | 01:45 PM

SciFiGuy

Road Master

Joined: May 2008

Posts: 1,164

Likes: 31

From: San Antonio, Texas

According to the spec's for the 2011 vs a 2012 on the HD website

2011 92.6 ft lbs @ 3500 rpm
2012 100 ft lbs @ 3,250 rpm

Jul 20, 2011 | 02:07 PM

RollaMo

Grand HDF Member

Joined: May 2008

Posts: 4,579

Likes: 668

From: Rolla

Quote:

Originally Posted by SciFiGuy

According to the spec's for the 2011 vs a 2012 on the HD website

2011 92.6 ft lbs @ 3500 rpm
2012 100 ft lbs @ 3,250 rpm

That 2011 number you listed is for the 96" engine.

2011 103" = 102 ft lbs @ 3,500 rpm
2012 103" = 100 ft lbs @ 3,250 rpm

Jul 20, 2011 | 02:10 PM

bmaier

Stellar HDF Member

Joined: Jul 2009

Posts: 2,010

Likes: 139

From: Albuquerque New Mexico

Quote:

Originally Posted by SciFiGuy

According to the spec's for the 2011 vs a 2012 on the HD website

2011 92.6 ft lbs @ 3500 rpm
2012 100 ft lbs @ 3,250 rpm

Actually you are quoting the 2011 96" against the 2012 103". I believe the numbers are 100 ft lbs for BOTH years with the 103; at the crank, NOT on a dyno at the rear wheel

Jul 20, 2011 | 02:17 PM

SciFiGuy

Road Master

Joined: May 2008

Posts: 1,164

Likes: 31

From: San Antonio, Texas

Sorry my bad.

Jul 20, 2011 | 02:20 PM

Demolitionman

Tourer

Joined: Jan 2011

Posts: 255

Likes: 0

From: Greer, SC

either way, for it to not feel like a slosh bucket, you have to spend a little cash. i couldn't believe the difference in the feel after doing a stage 1 upgrade.