Sidekick vs. Badlander
Thread Starter
|
Road Warrior
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 56
From: Vancouver Island, British Columbia
Sidekick vs. Badlander
Which are the best feeling for your tush on a long trip? I would kind of think the Sidekick would be. Any opinions on other low profile "non-solo" versions from C&C or Dan Gray?Thanks
Road Master
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 803
Likes: 3
From: Collegeville, PA
I have a Sidekick on my Sportster and a Badlander on my FXR. The Sidekick is good for a half hour at most. The Badlander is a lot more comfortable. I would look at a Corbin Gunfighter as another option. I've owned them in the past and just got one for the FXR. Very comfortable after you break it in.
Cruiser
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
My brother said the Badlander was the equivalent of strapping a brick to his frame and going for a ride. We are both very Happy C&C customers. Chuck is awesome to deal with, price is awesome for the quality and custom look and feel.
Road Warrior
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,596
Likes: 9
From: Cherokee Co. Georgia
I have a badlander on my Ultra Classic when I have the tour pac off. I think it looks good but its named Badlander because its not a good place to be for a long period of time. A couple hours is all you will want to be on it at a time.
Road Master
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 760
Likes: 1
From: Mesa, AZ
To me they were about equal in comfort. I took the Badlander back, though, because I just didn't like the quality of it. Of course, it's a lot less expensive than the Sidekick so it's not a bad buy. Just wasn't for me.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
