When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I am specifically buying a set from LA Choppers just because they are 40 inches wide. MY reasoning is because I am 285 lbs and my shoulders are as wide as your average NFL Linebacker and need them that far apart. If I was a little guy, yeah that would probably be excessive
Dude, all you needed to do is tell us your reach, not your physique description. For all we know 285lbs could be in your gut.....
Just bustin' you chops bro! Thanks for your service too.
Originally Posted by Sgt. Fury
Not tryin to hijack the thread, but how is the visibility in the fairing mirrors with those bars?
I found that they suck with stock bars. I changed my mirrors before even before I'm ready to change the bars.
Originally Posted by DR. V-TWIN
I run the 16" 1.5" diameter Flyin' Apes. I find them quite comfy. You will get used to them, at least I know I did and quickly.
Drew
I wish Carlini had 1.5" thickness in 12" height...
So I guess the point is, the higher you go, the wider you go? Also for wind, I notice that if I put my legs outward on my highway pegs, it seems to direct wind directly to my body.. Hoping this isn't the same if my arms are spread out.
Ok, yea i just saw that on their website. For the 1.25" the width is 36.5" compared to the 1.5" being 41". I'm confused as to what would be the reason for this, and which would be more comfortable. I guess 2.25 inches per side isn't drastic sounding, but when it comes to ergonomics, inches definitely make a difference.. Thoughts? Wondering if I should exchange them for the 1.25".
The radius of the die used to bend the tube will increase as the tubes O.D. increases thus it will push the bars overall width farther out.
The radius of the die used to bend the tube will increase as the tubes O.D. increases thus it will push the bars overall width farther out.
Interesting.. So the width isn't determined based on an ergonomic design, but rather based on the equipment and diameter of bar? Seems like there isn't much ergonomic design thought put into it, rather, "If you want 1.5" bars, your width has to be X."
I just hate to go forward and pay for the bar install, only wishing I went narrower. It's hard to tell just by sitting ont he bike, need to really ride it to figure this sh*t out.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.