255 vs 254e in a 96"?
Given the HD choices listed, I'd look into the 204 or 254. 204 is a proven cam in the 96", 254 give a little more oomph higher up. Hard to find info on 254's due to them being such a relatively new cam.
TW555 are great cams, but the OP was specifically asking about 254 vs 255. Warranty concerns I'm guessing? Nothing wrong with that at all. Analyze how you ride. If you find yourself above 4,000 RPMs a fair amount of time, the 254 will be better. If you hardly ever venture that high in the RPMs, the 255s will put a smile on your face every time.
I'll once again dispute the notion that 255's "run out of steam" after 4000 rpm (or whatever), which isn't the sensation I get riding my bike or reflected in any dyno chart I've seen. TQ peaks at around 3200 and HP around 5000, slowly falling off above that. They definitely don't pull as hard as most performance cams above about 4000 rpm, but they aren't designed to be quarter-mile burners. They're designed to pass trucks in 5th gear with luggage and a passenger on board.
Last edited by iclick; Nov 11, 2011 at 04:17 PM.
Given the HD choices listed, I'd look into the 204 or 254. 204 is a proven cam in the 96", 254 give a little more oomph higher up. Hard to find info on 254's due to them being such a relatively new cam.
TW555 are great cams, but the OP was specifically asking about 254 vs 255. Warranty concerns I'm guessing? Nothing wrong with that at all. Analyze how you ride. If you find yourself above 4,000 RPMs a fair amount of time, the 254 will be better. If you hardly ever venture that high in the RPMs, the 255s will put a smile on your face every time.
As far as riding style. Its pretty much cruising, back and forth to work, and racing a buddy now and then. So I do want something that will pull a little in the upper rpm's.
Again, I would like to match the power of my old 95" Road King. It made 10 hp & 8 ft lbs more then my 96" stage 1. Both bikes had Rinehart true duals (different design on new bike) I think the Road King had a 203 cam. It really worked good for my riding style.
Do what you want but I've got my cams sitting on my dresser & will be installing them next month along with my new exhaust. For the type of riding you do I can't imagine you wouldn't be happy with them. PM iclick, he sounds pretty happy to me....
Last edited by klaybus; Nov 11, 2011 at 06:53 PM. Reason: typo
. FM's kit is $50 at last check. My cam job was $285, but I bought the HD kit for about $75 (on-line, but more now) before FM offered theirs. That also included the Beatty bearing kit at $100. If you have all the necessary tools I really think you can do this job for ~$200 given some patience waiting for the right deal on Ebay. That's a great performance bargain for the money.
Last edited by iclick; Nov 11, 2011 at 08:18 PM.
If you ran a Woods 555 cam it would be so much funner than a EPA 255 cam. And it wouldn't run out of power and you askin yourself, man if I just had a little more.
As much work as puttin a cam in is. I'd put a little more aggressive cam in. Replace the bearings and lifters if you have over 10,000 on them.
Anything worth doing is worth doing right.
Another reason to go with Woods 555 cam. Ask Jamie if which cam performs the best. He dyno's them.
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
No matter what, I bet it feels good leaving a stop sign.


