My DYNOJET Results
Thread Starter
|
Stellar HDF Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,947
Likes: 234
From: Kentucky
My DYNO Results 255 Cams
2012 FLHX 103ci
Stock Pistons
Stock Heads
S.E. Stage One A/C
S.E. 255 cams
V&H ProPipe
S.E. Pro Super Tuner
Max Power 91.31
Max torque 106.02
Stock Pistons
Stock Heads
S.E. Stage One A/C
S.E. 255 cams
V&H ProPipe
S.E. Pro Super Tuner
Max Power 91.31
Max torque 106.02
Last edited by dontdropit; Sep 2, 2013 at 12:12 PM.
Seasoned HDF Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,336
Likes: 67
From: SW Minnesota
Is that the only graph your dyno operator gave you? Most people who run 255's do it for the "down low" torque. I'd be interested in knowing what it looks like from 2,000 on up. You can't get to 3,000 rpm without first taking off from idle, every single time you ride. The graph you posted starts at 3,000 rpm with a torque peak that goes down from there.
I'm hoping iclick sees this post, and offers his opinion. He seems to be our resident "255" expert.
It looks dang good to me, but I thought the torque would have continued longer before dropping off with the 255's.
I'm hoping iclick sees this post, and offers his opinion. He seems to be our resident "255" expert.
It looks dang good to me, but I thought the torque would have continued longer before dropping off with the 255's.
Last edited by MNPGRider; Nov 25, 2011 at 05:45 PM.
Thread Starter
|
Stellar HDF Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,947
Likes: 234
From: Kentucky
Is that the only graph your dyno operator gave you? Most people who run 255's do it for the "down low" torque. I'd be interested in knowing what it looks like from 2,000 on up. You can't get to 3,000 rpm without first taking off from idle, every single time you ride. The graph you posted starts at 3,000 rpm with a torque peak that goes down from there.
I'm hoping iclick sees this post, and offers his opinion. He seems to be our resident "255" expert.
It looks dang good to me, but I thought the torque would have continued longer before dropping off with the 255's.
I'm hoping iclick sees this post, and offers his opinion. He seems to be our resident "255" expert.
It looks dang good to me, but I thought the torque would have continued longer before dropping off with the 255's.
Seasoned HDF Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,336
Likes: 67
From: SW Minnesota
dontdropit, you might get more response on the thread pinned to the top of this forum.
https://www.hdforums.com/forum/touri...r-baggers.html
Put up your chart and specs there. There's a couple of dyno operators checking in a lot.
https://www.hdforums.com/forum/touri...r-baggers.html
Put up your chart and specs there. There's a couple of dyno operators checking in a lot.
Road Warrior
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 56
From: Vancouver Island, British Columbia
I noticed that too, I wonder how much less the numbers would've been with the more common "SAE" chart?
Usually the #'s would be 2.6xx less using SAE
Trending Topics
Seasoned HDF Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 17,145
Likes: 6,168
From: SE Michigan
3-5%, I think
HD Forum Stories
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Verdad Gallardo
8 Best Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
10 Worst Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
Killer Custom's Jail Break Is The Breakout That Refused to Blend In
Verdad Gallardo
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Verdad Gallardo
Harley-Davidson Reveals Super Cool Cafe Racer Concept
Verdad Gallardo
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Verdad Gallardo
10 Motorcycles You Should Never Buy
Joe Kucinski
10 Things Harley-Davidson Needs to Fix in 2026
Verdad Gallardo
Thread Starter
|
Stellar HDF Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,947
Likes: 234
From: Kentucky
Is that the only graph your dyno operator gave you? Most people who run 255's do it for the "down low" torque. I'd be interested in knowing what it looks like from 2,000 on up. You can't get to 3,000 rpm without first taking off from idle, every single time you ride. The graph you posted starts at 3,000 rpm with a torque peak that goes down from there.
I'm hoping iclick sees this post, and offers his opinion. He seems to be our resident "255" expert.
It looks dang good to me, but I thought the torque would have continued longer before dropping off with the 255's.
I'm hoping iclick sees this post, and offers his opinion. He seems to be our resident "255" expert.
It looks dang good to me, but I thought the torque would have continued longer before dropping off with the 255's.