cams
1. if possible I wanted to keep the stock push rods ( personal choice) (10%)
2. I wanted to improve low to med rpm power (this is where I drive , and what the motor was designed for) (40%)
3. wanted it to be quite (10%)
4. wanted to maintain reasonable mpg (20%)
5. wanted a cam that would not grossly affect longevity of the motor (15%)
6. wanted it to be a good price (5%)
after researching a bunch of cams I came to the conclusion that the se255 was the best cam for me...there are several cams with similar power profiles and the se255 fit in with them and was cheaper. In my case the price was the item that pushed me to the se255 as the rest of items on the list were available from several cams....for example the woods 555 cam is a good cam with a similar curve as the se255 but it needed to have adjustable push rods installed (smaller base circle) and it can sometimes be noisy also it cost about 25% more than the se255 ( I bought the se255 new off of ebay for $199)
1. if possible I wanted to keep the stock push rods ( personal choice) (10%)
2. I wanted to improve low to med rpm power (this is where I drive , and what the motor was designed for) (40%)
3. wanted it to be quite (10%)
4. wanted to maintain reasonable mpg (20%)
5. wanted a cam that would not grossly affect longevity of the motor (15%)
6. wanted it to be a good price (5%)
after researching a bunch of cams I came to the conclusion that the se255 was the best cam for me...there are several cams with similar power profiles and the se255 fit in with them and was cheaper. In my case the price was the item that pushed me to the se255 as the rest of items on the list were available from several cams....for example the woods 555 cam is a good cam with a similar curve as the se255 but it needed to have adjustable push rods installed (smaller base circle) and it can sometimes be noisy also it cost about 25% more than the se255 ( I bought the se255 new off of ebay for $199)
SC
Last edited by iclick; Jan 4, 2012 at 03:56 PM.
As an example, I have run the SE204, intake TDC lift of .208" with heads that had been decked .065" and a .030" head gasket. The more important issue, for me anyway, what was the piston to valve clearance. In this build, it was .040". I would have preferred to see .060" but had decided I could live with .030".
You won't see TDC lifts much higher than the intake lift of the SE204 when looking at bolt in cams. However, once you start looking at cams with .640" or .720" lift, intake lifts can exceed .250".
If larger intake valves are used with OEM pistons, the position of the intake valve relief can become an issue. The relief is usually deep enough but not positioned properly ant the outer edge of the larger valve can kiss the top of the piston. The valve reliefs need to be flycut and moved out toward the outside of the piston.
Once you get away from bolt in cams and start using thinner head gaskets and decked heads, mocking up the top end and checking piston to valve clearance is worth the time and effort.
I read were Jamie mentioned Not needing compression releases with the 555's...I don't suppose it would hurt to have them anyway. So far my mech's advice is matching alot of the good advice I find here. 2 up 25% - solo I like to twist it thru the mid-range. All parts working together...hows this pkg. sound ?
S&S AC - 103 - Woods 555 - TTS - Manual CR - Dresser Duals - Monster Rounds
comments welcome
SC
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
S&S AC - 103 - Woods 555 - TTS - Manual CR - Dresser Duals - Monster Rounds
Last edited by iclick; Jan 4, 2012 at 11:43 PM.







