When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I like the woods cams if that is the cam you want get it if you ask on here you will get alot of different opinions no matter what cam you choose it is better than stock
For what it's worth I bolted in a Andrews 37 in a friends 07 Streetglide and cause the gearing was off a little for that cam it was a little soft on the bottom. Since they have changed the gearing and you have a 103 engine the 37 would be ok but I still prefer the 204 over the 37. I've had a 37 also in a 95" with the comp set at 9.8 and it was ok. I guess I'm sold on the 204 for a bolt in cam though.
I've always been a fan of a relativly short duration camshaft, but high lift. (Yes, that means Wood's cams or any others that meet the criteria) I'd look real close at the Wood TW-5-6....I wish I would have gone with it instead of the TW-555. The TW-5-6 will work well with the compression your 103 has and should be a real stump puller once you get it tuned properly!
You can view the specs of the Wood cams here:
The SE 204 is a good choice as far as duration is concerned, but with it's lift of (only) .508 it falls a little short (no pun intended) for my tastes. I'd shoot for something in the .550-.575 range, nothing over .575 or you're looking at the purchase of new valve springs.
Last edited by Gearhead3; Jan 14, 2012 at 11:12 AM.
The SE 204 is a good choice as far as duration is concerned, but with it's lift of (only) .508 it falls a little short (no pun intended) for my tastes. I'd shoot for something in the .550-.575 range, nothing over .575 or you're looking at the purchase of new valve springs.
From what I've seen the .575 value isn't set in stone. Some cams have very quick jerk/acceleration rates and really should have better springs installed even if they don't exceed .575. Crane says to change springs with their .575 lift cam, while Redshift/Zippers says their .577 is good with stock springs. Roller lifters don't take kindly to valve float.
I personally wouldn't risk anything close as none of the cam companies are going to eat the cost of a blown motor due to a dropped valve after a spring broke, even if they said it was going to be okay with stock valvesprings.
I'm going to do 204's + 1.72 rockers for my stock 103, unless major scope creep kicks in before buying the parts.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.