Dumb question time
Ya cant really count sturgis can ya? I mean its only like 5 hours from me. But in your pic your standin infront of Dillon so im guessing your another 2 hours south of me. So thats 7 hrs. I dont really have a point....I just wanted to prove I can do math.
If you get right down to it, the SG is hardly a good touring platform in stock form. The 12" shocks are awful and the stock WS isn't good for anything except looking good in the showroom. It took quite a bit of accessorizing to put my SG up to my touring standards. If I had to choose between a stone-stock Heritage Softail and a stone-stock SG to ride 5k miles, I'd probably pick the Softail for the WS advantage alone. Softails don't have great shocks either, IMO, and the rear suspension is more of a nostalgia-oriented styling exercise than a design with comfort the biggest priority--but at least it has a decent WS.
Last edited by iclick; Feb 3, 2012 at 04:55 PM.
I toured on my 97 Softtail Heritage Classic, and was completely satisfied with it. It is still my favorite bike. Wish my Ultra was the same color. But my wife kept looking at the rest of the group I rode with and admiring their nice passenger seats and the extra room in the tour pack versus my military back pack on the sissy bar. Not to mention we always had to ride in the middle because of no communications with the rest of the group. So because of a seat, tour pac, and a CB radio, I now own a Ultra Classic!! (wish I could have afforded to keep the Heritage too!)
1. You have owned a Shovel-I wanted to buy a FXE 12 years ago but my ex missus would not entertain the idea (there is a reason she is my ex);
2. Traveling the Gulf to Canada - I am from Australia and riding the length and breadth of the US has been a dream of mine since I was a kid; and
3. 160000 miles riding- wish I had the time...
You are missing the point... A "Touring" Harley isn't about what it can 'do'... it IS about what engine and frame it has. The Heritage does NOT have the Harley 'Touring' frame... so it is NOT a member of the 'touring' family. Also... that 103 in the King is a totally different engine than the 103 is a Heritage. The King has an ALPHA engine, and the Heritage has the BETA engine. The "A" motor is rubber mounted. The "B" motor is soild mounted and has internal rotating shafts for balancing.
The three big twin models are Touring... Softail... Dyna. These are based upon which FRAME is in the bike and has NOTHING to do with what YOU think it should be based upon capabilities.
The three big twin models are Touring... Softail... Dyna. These are based upon which FRAME is in the bike and has NOTHING to do with what YOU think it should be based upon capabilities.
Harley created a line of bikes that THEY felt was the best set-up for long distance(touring)...and those bikes got a certain frame, and a certain motor type...that's their Touring line..the Heritage, although fully capable of touring..is a compromise between form and function...still a real nice bike though...always thought it was a great value for a softail...


