Big Sucker Installed
Thread Starter
|
Tourer
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 395
Likes: 11
From: Oklahoma
Big Sucker Installed
I installed the AN Big Sucker on my 2012 FLHTK last night. Definately made a difference in the way the bike runs. It was the last link in my stage 1 setup and surely one that was needed. It really woke the bike up and it's running really nice now. The AT should be here tomorrow and then that will go on to finish up everything for now. Then the decision as to whether or not to change out the cams. Does it ever stop????
Road Captain
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 659
Likes: 2
From: Central Ohio
Never ends! I put cams in last year to gain some low end torque and wake the exhaust up. The cam is mild and I said that is all I need. Now, I am planning this Winter to go with a big bore kit and new pistons. Just ordered a set the other day. After thinking harder, I am still hungry for more so I plan on porting the heads for a better flow. Why can't I just be happy with what I have 
MODERATOR
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,108
Likes: 1,964
From: New England
I installed the AN Big Sucker on my 2012 FLHTK last night. Definately made a difference in the way the bike runs. It was the last link in my stage 1 setup and surely one that was needed. It really woke the bike up and it's running really nice now. The AT should be here tomorrow and then that will go on to finish up everything for now. Then the decision as to whether or not to change out the cams. Does it ever stop????
I installed one on my 2012 and found the fit less the adequate (purchased new directly from AN). Had to smooth out the surfaces to get a better fit.
Then I found the AN seemed to suck a lot of oil out of the breathers causing a mess so you might want to check that often.
I also did some tuning/data runs and found almost no difference in the VE's between the stock and AN systems. In short, I went back to the stock system with much better results.
Personally, I would not recommend the AN to anyone.
Extreme HDF Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 14,744
Likes: 402
From: Phoenix '53, '88, '09 Big Twins
I recall testing some years ago which has numbers like
stock 134 CFM
Ness 260 CFM
S/E 270 CFM
The latter both exceed the theoretical limits of the motor.
( other numbers:
no air cleaner 110 CFM
cupped hand 150 CFM
Zippers 280 )
After running S/E for years on evos- and installing many on other bikes- i find that the Ness Big Sucker is a better value in terms of appearance ( chrome backing plate) ease of install and filter media ( washable oiled)--- and cost. about $120.
- and with either system, no undue oil condensing from the breather mist- the heads vent a mist of oil and air which has to be directed properly to the intake.
Mike
Last edited by mkguitar; Aug 9, 2012 at 11:51 AM.
Cruiser
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 155
Likes: 1
From: Albuquerque
Recently completed Stg1 with AN bigg sucker, V&H power duels and SE tuner (have it dyno'd after all is installed. Made all the difference). Running OE cams (103 Ultra Limited), thinking maybe new cams next yr. Want to ride this setup awhile and do some research on what I want power wise. There are so many options with cams (low end torque or high end hp).
Road Master
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,092
Likes: 35
From: Fl
Very happy with the Ness Big Sucker. The install was simple, the chrome looks great, and it seems to work real well, no oil drips at all. I'm curious about the numbers as well.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
|
Tourer
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 395
Likes: 11
From: Oklahoma
Glad the AN worked on your bike.
I installed one on my 2012 and found the fit less the adequate (purchased new directly from AN). Had to smooth out the surfaces to get a better fit.
Then I found the AN seemed to suck a lot of oil out of the breathers causing a mess so you might want to check that often.
I also did some tuning/data runs and found almost no difference in the VE's between the stock and AN systems. In short, I went back to the stock system with much better results.
Personally, I would not recommend the AN to anyone.
I installed one on my 2012 and found the fit less the adequate (purchased new directly from AN). Had to smooth out the surfaces to get a better fit.
Then I found the AN seemed to suck a lot of oil out of the breathers causing a mess so you might want to check that often.
I also did some tuning/data runs and found almost no difference in the VE's between the stock and AN systems. In short, I went back to the stock system with much better results.
Personally, I would not recommend the AN to anyone.
HD Forum Stories
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Verdad Gallardo
8 Best Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
10 Worst Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
Killer Custom's Jail Break Is The Breakout That Refused to Blend In
Verdad Gallardo
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Verdad Gallardo
Harley-Davidson Reveals Super Cool Cafe Racer Concept
Verdad Gallardo
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Verdad Gallardo
10 Motorcycles You Should Never Buy
Joe Kucinski
10 Things Harley-Davidson Needs to Fix in 2026
Verdad Gallardo
Extreme HDF Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 10,216
Likes: 224
From: Glendale AZ
I installed a PCV with Jackpots and unrestricted header using stock air box with a KN filter. The last step was Stealth breather and felt no real diff (seat of pants). In fact the map Jamie sent me def shows added fuel to many areas so I know it wasnt still running lean anymore but to say I felt an incredible diff would be disingenuous. But to go with the OP theme the intake was less than impressive. I think its as good as its going to run without a dyno. Im guessing it already had all the air it needed and the open breather wasnt necessary.