Lower rear but not the front

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Feb 23, 2007 | 12:01 PM

alwilson

Thread Starter

Road Master

Joined: Dec 2006

Posts: 944

Likes: 0

From: Eunice, Louisiana

Lower rear but not the front

Hi Guys
I have lower my rear on my 2005 Electra Glide, can any one tell me if the bike willHander ok, or do ineed to lowerthe front also? just want to check if any one had a problem that.

Thanks

Feb 23, 2007 | 12:19 PM

bountyhunter

Banned

Joined: Nov 2005

Posts: 3,499

Likes: 2

From: CANADA

RE: Lower rear but not the front

Will handle fine if you lower the rear only.

Feb 23, 2007 | 12:24 PM

sleepneagle

Outstanding HDF Member

Joined: May 2006

Posts: 3,273

Likes: 7

From:

RE: Lower rear but not the front

by lowering the rear, you have increased the rake/trail angle. The bike may steer a little heavier.

Feb 23, 2007 | 12:30 PM

AtkRWC

Elite HDF Member

Joined: Jul 2006

Posts: 4,813

Likes: 6

From: Rio Grande Valley-Texas

RE: Lower rear but not the front

I lowered my EG by 1 1/2 in the rear only. At first I noticed the difference but now after 5000 miles it is normal. THe handling is different but not bad.

Feb 23, 2007 | 12:31 PM

harley0711

Seasoned HDF Member

Joined: Sep 2005

Posts: 5,072

Likes: 104

From: Prescott, AZ

RE: Lower rear but not the front

Also, if you ride Two up - the passanger may feel the bumps a little more..

Feb 23, 2007 | 12:45 PM

AtkRWC

Elite HDF Member

Joined: Jul 2006

Posts: 4,813

Likes: 6

From: Rio Grande Valley-Texas

RE: Lower rear but not the front

Quote:

ORIGINAL: harley0711

Also, if you ride Two up - the passanger may feel the bumps a little more..

Very True. I put an aftermarket seat on that is also lower than stock but slightly wider. Wife says it feels fine. Over some potholes and such I can feel it. Currently using 412s (11.5") but thinking about switching to 440s to cure this minor issue.