When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
42 Gunner, I don't speak Spanish but your cute meme has no relevance. Oil is an important issue for most motorcycle owners. Just because you know it all doesn't mean everyone does. Just ignore all subsequent posts.
Ahhh, here we go. In another post I detailed the problems I've experienced with synthetic motor oil. One problem with synthetics is that they don't hold particles in suspension as well as mineral oils. The result is that the contaminants don't always make it to the filter and instead precipitate in areas of the motor where oil tends to pool (such as the valve covers where the contaminants end up in the valve guides). Shell actually discontinued their Aero Shell synthetic because of this problem. There were many reports of valve sticking on Lycoming engines due to gunk in the valve guides. Most people base their strong support of synthetics on marketing hype. They buy into it hook, line and sinker. It's not justified. I have motorcycles that are over 50 years old that have had nothing but mineral oil in them. They're still running.
Another reason is that the term 'synthetic' doesn't mean anything. You may be interested in searching on the Internet for a law suit between Mobil 1 and Castol. Mobil 1 sued Castrol for claiming that their Syntec motor oil was synthetic when it was manufactured from Class IV mineral oil. Castrol won based upon the argument that the term 'synthetic' has no generally accepted meaning and is actually a group of properties. It's an interesting case and should, if you're not completely bought into the marketing hype, tell you that not all is truth in the synthetic oil world.
Very nice and interesting. Haven't heard of people having problems with syn. NOT saying it doesn't happen or it isn't true. Biggest complaint I've heard (same one everyone has) is more noise. Noise I'm not concerned about. Talked to engineers that test oils and I derive most of my opinions from that. The one test I really like is the compression test. The oil that tested the best was Mobil 1. It took more psi to squeeze the oil out than any conventional. Since most of the damage comes from start up I like knowing that there is oil still on the internals. Don't get me wrong, all oils have advanced in leaps and bounds, I've just seen enough proof first hand to justify the use, but that's me. I can appreciate people using whatever they want and if I had problems it would make me think twice about using it. I personally think most filters are subpar and can't handle the intervals that most oils can. Then again, that's just me.
... Talked to engineers that test oils and I derive most of my opinions from that. ...
I'm very interested in the opinions of engineers that actually test oils. Can you share their advice? When I approached a Mobil 1 engineer at a car rally about the precipitation problem he just got quiet and blushed. Not sure if he didn't know of the problem or did and didn't want to talk about it.
As an aside, have you noticed how synthetic prices have increased along with oil prices despite the fact that they claim that they are not made from mineral oil? I'd be interested in what the engineers say about that as well. As soon as Castol GTX goes up in price the synthetics go up even more. Coincidence?
I'm very interested in the opinions of engineers that actually test oils. Can you share their advice? When I approached a Mobil 1 engineer at a car rally about the precipitation problem he just got quiet and blushed. Not sure if he didn't know of the problem or did and didn't want to talk about it.
As an aside, have you noticed how synthetic prices have increased along with oil prices despite the fact that they claim that they are not made from mineral oil? I'd be interested in what the engineers say about that as well. As soon as Castol GTX goes up in price the synthetics go up even more. Coincidence?
What was nice is that it wasn't an oil manufacturer. It was an indy doing tests for the big 3. They said out of the oils they did test (including dino) Mobil 1 was the best and Ford syn tested a VERY close second. Castrol didn't fare well. Kinda sucks because I used Castrol. Used to. Conventional didn't hold a candle to full syn and everyone there was a huge fan of using syn in all vehicles. They focused on heat and pressure and not suspension, so the claims that you posted, I'm curious to find out more about, I'd like to know more. With my job I get to see a lot of cool **** when it comes to auto manufacturing including putting in a dyno for Detroit Diesel. Some bad *** motors roll through there. I have a picture somewhere of one of their motors on the dyno an it's taller than a 6' ladder right next to it. A lot of destruction tests too.
Yes, I have noticed the prices and have always wondered why it went up with the price of crude. If it's truly synthetic it shouldn't matter.
On a side note. Chevy had problems when running a high flow air filter. So, if you have a chevy and a high flow filter, stop using it. You'll run too lean unless you run a programmer.
Ahhh, here we go. In another post I detailed the problems I've experienced with synthetic motor oil. One problem with synthetics is that they don't hold particles in suspension as well as mineral oils. The result is that the contaminants don't always make it to the filter and instead precipitate in areas of the motor where oil tends to pool (such as the valve covers where the contaminants end up in the valve guides). Shell actually discontinued their Aero Shell synthetic because of this problem. There were many reports of valve sticking on Lycoming engines (aircraft air cooled engines) due to gunk in the valve guides. Most people base their strong support of synthetics on marketing hype. They buy into it hook, line and sinker. It's not justified. I have motorcycles that are over 50 years old that have had nothing but mineral oil in them. They're still running. They've been running long since their odometers quit working.
Another reason is that the term 'synthetic' doesn't mean anything. You may be interested in searching on the Internet for a law suit between Mobil 1 and Castol. Mobil 1 sued Castrol for claiming that their Syntec motor oil was synthetic when it was manufactured from Class IV mineral oil. Castrol won based upon the argument that the term 'synthetic' has no generally accepted meaning and is actually a group of properties. It's an interesting case and should, if you're not completely bought into the marketing hype, tell you that not all is truth in the synthetic oil world.
Edit: Did I mention that mineral oil is far cheaper?
First time I heard of syn not holding particles in suspension as well. Is that a general problem or a specific oil under specific conditions? Careful about applying broad brush strokes when it's not applicable. I do agree that cost vs benefit may not be there in all cases but extremely hot running air cooled vtwins are not the norm. There are benefits that syn provides for our application. You really can't argue that... Can you?
Shell actually discontinued their Aero Shell synthetic because of this problem. There were many reports of valve sticking on Lycoming engines (aircraft air cooled engines) due to gunk in the valve guides.
I must be missing something, Aero Shell synthetic is still on the market and very popular with pilots.
I had a 1995 ford explorer that we vacationed loaded for 180,000 miles. Took valve covers off and you could literally eat off the spotless heads. Looked like the day it was built. Mobil1 5w-30 for 180k miles. 5k oil changes.
Lets see.....syn oil, check.
Syn in all three holes, check.
Gas cap @ three clicks, check.
Get on from the correct side, check.
No doo rag or a$$less chaps, check.
Installed some silly looking ape hanger bars, check.
Got the absolute loudest 2-1 exhaust, check.
Been practicing my bad-a$$ biker scowl, check.
Think I'm ready to ride - hope I didn't forget something.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.