sepst map question
when you say "The touring models from 2010 to 2013 all use the 9 strategy" are you able to read the ECM map of a stock bike? Do you have the Calibration description pdf file? want to be on the same page in this discussion. 009FY002 & 044AAG003 are both listed for 2010-2013 base 1580cc. The 044 starts with higher VE #'s but I notice no other difference.
"The 10 to 15% richer for the 2 in 1 is from past experience." Not disputing your previous experience. was this with a lambda based map? both maps I refer to already start at 14.3 AFR, the lowest for closed loop, so already richer than 14.6. where do you add 10-15% fuel, in the AFR table or the VE
I have been tuning automotive drag engines for 30 plus years. Everything from 3 hemi Super stockers, 1 injected 392 Hemi B altered, 1 injected Fuel front motor dragster (didn't last long as that thing was dangerous) 2 Ford stockers one 351C and one with 200 inch 6 cylinder that held 7 national records, several ET Bracket Mopars with 440's and hemi's and several Ford 302, 351C Jack Roush built B Econo Altered. I built a few Chevy 350's, and 383's. If you were a ford or mopar person the chevy boys didn't have much to say to you. All of these were either carburated or Mechanical Hilborn injectors. Some of these had 800 lift cams and turned 8000 rpms, one even ran 9000 rpms (the Jack Roush Cleveland). I didn't own all these just worked on them with friends. I did own 2 drag cars and had a ball. I spent many hours at the Drag Strips listening more than I talked. First time I wrote all this down, wow have touched or should I say been touched by some marvelous machines.
Once I got into bikes (2010 bought FLHTK) the electronics end and cams intrigued me, so here I am. You learn to recognize when certain conditions exist. These are all street engines operating in the less than 6000 rpms on the bikes. They are all air pumps that you put fuel and air in and ignite it. When and what ratios is the question.
Contrary to someone elses belief the 10% is in the VE table. It won't eventually change back. I have been making maps for about 3 years and have done around 15 with PCV's and 20 plus with PV. and 4 with SEPST and one SERT. All either stage 1 or cams from SE255, SE203, SE204, SE259e, to TW222, TW555, TW777, TW888 to Andrews 55, t-man 555, Probably some I have forgotten. Also several with Stage 4's with 10.5:1 compression. Higher than that and you need a dyno. Have done exhaust from the 2-1-2, power duals, true duals, several 2-1's. These were in everything from Dyna's, Softtails, Two trikes, and bunch of Touring SG's, Ultras and Road Glides, FLHTK's and 3 CVO's. Right now am batting a 1000. Not the first time everytime, but you get 3 strikes. I don't charge for it and if you don't like it we will undo it. That hasn't really happened yet. Not claiming dyno results by any means. I spend a lot of time at local Harley dealer (no Dyno) and the main mechanic will tell me when he needs a map for a certain application. I create it and he will install it if I am not around. He also has a very good sense of tune and will test ride. If everything isn't right we correct it before it leaves. And that is my story and I am sticking to it.
Don't know much about the years ago tuning only been doing for 3 years. Never seen a dyno.
when you say "The touring models from 2010 to 2013 all use the 9 strategy" are you able to read the ECM map of a stock bike? Do you have the Calibration description pdf file? want to be on the same page in this discussion. 009FY002 & 044AAG003 are both listed for 2010-2013 base 1580cc. The 044 starts with higher VE #'s but I notice no other difference.
"The 10 to 15% richer for the 2 in 1 is from past experience." Not disputing your previous experience. was this with a lambda based map? both maps I refer to already start at 14.3 AFR, the lowest for closed loop, so already richer than 14.6. where do you add 10-15% fuel, in the AFR table or the VE





