When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Has anyone run the Andrews 55 cams. I am putting them in a 2010 FLHTK. I know they have lots of duration and will have to increase Compression to above 10 to 1 eventually. I am also changing to the 30 tooth front pulley and 139 tooth belt. I know it will come on pretty far to the right for a heavy bike. I love the sound of True Duals and a larger overlap cam. I do my own tuning on PV, so getting a map won't be a problem. The 30 tooth will make up for some or most of the lowend torque loss. Already have all the stuff so just wanting to know if anyone has done the 55's and what was their thoughts.
That's a lot of cam for any bagger. I'm running 54s in my 103 with 10-1 compression pistons and stock heads. It makes 109/99 and 100+tq from 2500 to 5300. I'm thinking about headwork? I have no problem shifting and running higher rpms but without at least headwork and a compression bump I wouldn't go to 55s. And then I'd start worrying about the crank???
Last edited by 0ldhippie; Oct 24, 2013 at 09:08 AM.
That's a lot of cam for any bagger. I'm running 54s in my 103 with 10-1 compression pistons and stock heads. It makes 109/99 and 100+tq from 2500 to 5300. I'm thinking about headwork? I have no problem shifting and running higher rpms but without at least headwork and a compression bump I wouldn't go to 55s. And then I'd start worrying about the crank???
Thanks for the reply. You are right on your thinking. What I am going by is the 55's are real close kin to the 259E and they work fine in the 103 with more compression. The major difference and why I didn't go with the 259E or one of the TW777 is the .575 and .579 lift compared to the .550 for the 55. I have tuned several baggers with PV and SEPST with the 259's and 777's and they all worked really well. The 30 tooth will get the lowend torque to a manageable level. I like the large cam sound. I will eventually go on up in compression also. Need little incentive. I don't plan on buzzing over 5000 RPMs anyway. I can always go back to a lower overlap cam like the 54 or TW555. I hate paying extra $100+ bucks for the TW or T-Man. I guess I like a challenge. I also like being different. I don't do any long distance riding so not concerned with higher RPMS on road.
Son in law has a 2012 FLHTK and the TW555 cams and 30 tooth pulley setup. It has way more torque from idle than the stock and will run 6th gear down to 45 mph if you want. It will take the slack up in the forks when you accelerate in 6th gear at 60 mph. I ride his quite a bit while supposedly tuning it and it will make me regret getting back on my stage 1 2010 FLHTK. Hopefully the 55's will be ok. You can pour the timing to these higher duration cams without ping problems.
I won't have any dyno numbers, but will try and post results when I get off my rear and do the swap and tune.
Like oldhippie, I'm running the 54s; had them in the 117" B-motor; and now in the 107" A-motor, 10.2:1 CR, no head work.
Did the 30-tooth output shaft switch before the engine work, now wish I hadn't because I need another gear; but I wouldn't go back either.
I will say that 2-up and loaded, there is no substitute for the 30-tooth gearing and getting off the line. We ride with a bunch of RKs and they got nothing on us getting going.
But my acceleration above 80-85 is a little slower than I'd like getting to the century.... guess it's time for headwork this winter.
Here is a map we are running on Son in laws bike with the TW555 and 30 tooth. He has the Power duals and 4 inch slipons. I didn't see what exhaust you are running. The timing map on this one is close to being maxed out. If you are running 2 in 1 or 2 in 2 may need to richen the idle and cruise range some. I would go 5% at a time if it pops at a steady cruise or if it hesitates at idle. If it speeds up and down at idle after warm will need to lean 2 to 5%. Don't think you will have ping problem, but can't ever be sure. I have already made a few adjustments for the 107 and 10.2 compression. Get the tune close as you can before autotuning is my recommendation. If you don't get what you expect with the autotune you can always go back to where you were. Try it or steal the timing map if different than yours. If you are still running the stock timing map it will be much different. Son in laws is pretty stout from 80 to 110 and he doesn't have the compression and is running 103. The 555 and 54 are pretty similar.
55's like some compression, but are probably the quietest I have heard.
Good to know on the quietest. I am using the Woods Directional Lifters and tapered pushrods and SE compensator also. Hopefully it will be quiet, but radio and exhaust are still dampening the noises. Most of the higher overlap/duration cams like more compression. The stock style cams are the only ones that don't benefit from compression as they build so much compression with their timing numbers and lack of overlap (below 20°) that they can't use any more.
Has anyone run the Andrews 55 cams. I am putting them in a 2010 FLHTK. I know they have lots of duration and will have to increase Compression to above 10 to 1 eventually. I am also changing to the 30 tooth front pulley and 139 tooth belt. I know it will come on pretty far to the right for a heavy bike. I love the sound of True Duals and a larger overlap cam. I do my own tuning on PV, so getting a map won't be a problem. The 30 tooth will make up for some or most of the lowend torque loss. Already have all the stuff so just wanting to know if anyone has done the 55's and what was their thoughts.
I have the Andrews 55HG gear drives in my 2013 FLHRC 103 with stock compression, and to me it's perfect! The rest of the engine is completely stock, the heads were never removed; it even has the stock throttle body, and stock valve springs. The only other mods are: SE extreme billet A/C, D&D Fat Cat 2into1 exhaust, SE Super a Tuner Pro, and of course the dyno tune. Oh I did put on one tooth smaller front sprocket. The bike screams. If you want to go fast all you have to do is twist the throttle no matter what gear your in. Torque is over 100ftlbs from 2500 RPM, and the peak numbers were 101 HP, and 111 TQ. The bike pulls hard from 2500 all the way to the rev limiter at 6500. I love this cam, and it had a nice lopie idle at 1K rpm. Suh-Weet!
I have the Andrews 55HG gear drives in my 2013 FLHRC 103 with stock compression, and to me it's perfect! The rest of the engine is completely stock, the heads were never removed; it even has the stock throttle body, and stock valve springs. The only other mods are: SE extreme billet A/C, D&D Fat Cat 2into1 exhaust, SE Super a Tuner Pro, and of course the dyno tune. Oh I did put on one tooth smaller front sprocket. The bike screams. If you want to go fast all you have to do is twist the throttle no matter what gear your in. Torque is over 100ftlbs from 2500 RPM, and the peak numbers were 101 HP, and 111 TQ. The bike pulls hard from 2500 all the way to the rev limiter at 6500. I love this cam, and it had a nice lopie idle at 1K rpm. Suh-Weet!
Thanks for the reply sforce68. I had started the mods on the 2010 Limited and got my arm twisted to get a 2014. Arm is still hurting as it got twisted really hard. Anyway I had already put the 30 tooth on the 10 and was getting ready to install the Andrews 55's. Dealership offered to swap everything over to the 14, but I decided to wait at least til broken in and I like to do my own work. Have already put 2 in 1 on and the PV. With the 10 to 1 compression PV and 2 in 1 it already runs pretty strong. I will put the cams and lifters in soon. Just getting motivation together and letting some of the new wear off the 14. Only have little over 2000 miles and am just beginning to quit playing with Boom Box. Got a feeling it has enough compression to do good with the 55's. Surprised to see the 100 torque at 2500. That is what I was worried about. Those dyno numbers will be fine also. I may still put the 30 or 31 tooth on for 6th gear at 60 mph.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.