When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I'm guessing there is more to this story than the 3 paragraphs in the article... maybe this guy went to the dealer multiple times (the article seems to say so) in attempts to let HD stand behind their product and make it right..... obviously they didn't or he wouldn't be doing this....
If the guy paid $40,000 for the "best" bike HD makes, or at least the very very top of the line, and it doesn't work right, and they are not fixing, what is he supposed to do??
A guy buys a $35k bike and the moco can't, or won't fix a coolant leak and he's a ***** for suing? I'll bet the moco would be happy with that attitude.
I sold new Harleys through the 2008 model year. I saw the introduction of the first cast crank bikes (cranks should be forged,) and the incredible crank run out issues, the first of the compensator and inner primary bearing problems and of course the wheel bearing failures when they switched to the cheaper 25mm axle.
My '00 Road Glide was hand built (first Screamin' Eagle,) and demonstrated none of those "new bike issues," (and still doesn't.) I passed 100,000 miles years ago. I'm glad I had the opportunity to see what was coming and held onto what I had. It's a decision from the top for a race to the bottom IMO. All the design improvements in the world mean nothing if you left out the quality for the sake of the dollars way back when.
A guy buys a $35k bike and the moco can't, or won't fix a coolant leak and he's a ***** for suing? I'll bet the moco would be happy with that attitude.
David
I agree. After buying my 2012 Ultra and joining this forum, I've noticed a certain level of desensitization when our bikes have problems. It's as if we accept a certain amount of poor build quality or poor customer service as part of the brand ownership. I've never experienced this in any other bike or car owner's group. If I bought a brand new $35K Ford truck and it leaked coolant, I would be taking legal action too if Ford MoCo would not or could not fix it. Kudos to this guy for not accepting mediocre Kool-Aid even when everyone else thinks it's great.
This snivelin' little weasel would have lost his mind had he bought a new Harley in the late 70's or early 80's and had to deal with all of the issues they had in those days....and yet, all of us guys who were riding them back in those days managed to have a damn good time with them.
This ain't the 70's. Water-cooled motors are nothing new. Harley should have got it right the first time. But instead, they rushed the bikes to market to meet competitive pressures and make a big splash at the 110th.
Harley will likely settle out of court with Mr. Okon. Bad press is isn't good for sales.
Bad press doesn't matter.....every time I wonder how Harley stays in business I just have to read a thread where people think problems should be over looked, quality shouldn't be an issue, and who cares how much it cost.
What is wrong with demanding that something you paid $25K+ for work as advertised? And when did accepting mediocracy equate to being less a biker??? Its unbelievable what some will accept because it is a name brand.
Like any other large company...Harley will address issues that affect their bottom line. That would be issues that kill people, potentially kill people or adversely affect THE BRAND.
The MOCO exists to make money. Everything they do, sell, talk about, etc., is to generate income for their shareholders.
It isn't necessarily evil. But it's what they do. If they could double profits in a sustainable (and guaranteed manner) making jell-o cooled, solar motorcycles; they would.
They are changing how they do business to "ride" that brand, "Harley Davidson" into the global market. If that takes off, they'll change some more. They're going to follow the money.
Personally, I hope the MOCO gets backhanded across the mouth if they have been taking the, "take it or leave it, that's normal" route regarding this problem. In this day and age, people expect more and as much as Harley promises getting you to sign, they better deliver.
/rant
This ain't the 70's. Water-cooled motors are nothing new. Harley should have got it right the first time. But instead, they rushed the bikes to market to meet competitive pressures and make a big splash at the 110th.
Harley will likely settle out of court with Mr. Okon. Bad press is isn't good for sales.
Aha! That's how they came up with the Rushmore name!
There may or may not be issues with the bike, however class action lawsuits are usually brought for one main reason, some attorney wants to get paid... rather than protect the "class" or people in this case that bought the bikes.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.