More efficient setup
Thread Starter
|
Tourer
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 432
Likes: 10
From: Miami/FL
More efficient setup
OK guys, Let's assume that you have a 4 channel amp that gives you two 300 watts channels on bridge mode, for a 4 Ohms load.
At the same time you have a pair of 8 ohms speakers to hook up to this amp.
Let's say that you want to send 150 watts to each speakers, so you have two choices.
A- Bridge two channels of the amp at 300 Watts, and put the speakers in parallel. This will bring the total load to 4 Ohms in and each speaker gets 150 watts.
B - Bridge two pair of channels at 300 watts and put one speaker on each bridge side, so each speaker receives 150 watts.
Which of this two methods would be moe efficient regarding the amp overal performance (heat, power, etc)
At the same time you have a pair of 8 ohms speakers to hook up to this amp.
Let's say that you want to send 150 watts to each speakers, so you have two choices.
A- Bridge two channels of the amp at 300 Watts, and put the speakers in parallel. This will bring the total load to 4 Ohms in and each speaker gets 150 watts.
B - Bridge two pair of channels at 300 watts and put one speaker on each bridge side, so each speaker receives 150 watts.
Which of this two methods would be moe efficient regarding the amp overal performance (heat, power, etc)
Last edited by flcusat; Nov 22, 2017 at 08:23 AM.
Seasoned HDF Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 10,637
Likes: 1,246
From: Lake, Ms
Option B will be the least stressful on the amp but I would go with option A myself. The amp is designed to run at those specs so in order to optimize the setup, option A is the way to go. Plus it leaves 2 additional channels for more speakers.
Outstanding HDF Member
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,267
Likes: 135
From: Midland Twp, MI
OK guys, Let's assume that you have a 4 channel amp that gives you two 300 watts channels on bridge mode, for a 4 Ohms load.
At the same time you have a pair of 8 ohms speakers to hook up to this amp.
Let's say that you want to send 150 watts to each speakers, so you have two choices.
A- Bridge two channels of the amp at 300 Watts, and put the speakers in parallel. This will bring the total load to 4 Ohms in and each speaker gets 150 watts.
B - Bridge two pair of channels at 300 watts and put one speaker on each bridge side, so each speaker receives 150 watts.
Which of this two methods would be moe efficient regarding the amp overal performance (heat, power, etc)
At the same time you have a pair of 8 ohms speakers to hook up to this amp.
Let's say that you want to send 150 watts to each speakers, so you have two choices.
A- Bridge two channels of the amp at 300 Watts, and put the speakers in parallel. This will bring the total load to 4 Ohms in and each speaker gets 150 watts.
B - Bridge two pair of channels at 300 watts and put one speaker on each bridge side, so each speaker receives 150 watts.
Which of this two methods would be moe efficient regarding the amp overal performance (heat, power, etc)
Road Master
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 79
From: so cal
OK guys, Let's assume that you have a 4 channel amp that gives you two 300 watts channels on bridge mode, for a 4 Ohms load.
At the same time you have a pair of 8 ohms speakers to hook up to this amp.
Let's say that you want to send 150 watts to each speakers, so you have two choices.
A- Bridge two channels of the amp at 300 Watts, and put the speakers in parallel. This will bring the total load to 4 Ohms in and each speaker gets 150 watts.
B - Bridge two pair of channels at 300 watts and put one speaker on each bridge side, so each speaker receives 150 watts.
Which of this two methods would be moe efficient regarding the amp overal performance (heat, power, etc)
At the same time you have a pair of 8 ohms speakers to hook up to this amp.
Let's say that you want to send 150 watts to each speakers, so you have two choices.
A- Bridge two channels of the amp at 300 Watts, and put the speakers in parallel. This will bring the total load to 4 Ohms in and each speaker gets 150 watts.
B - Bridge two pair of channels at 300 watts and put one speaker on each bridge side, so each speaker receives 150 watts.
Which of this two methods would be moe efficient regarding the amp overal performance (heat, power, etc)
Outstanding HDF Member
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,267
Likes: 135
From: Midland Twp, MI
As long as each set of channels are set to the same voltage each 8 ohm speaker would get half of the bridged 4ohm wattage
Road Captain
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 738
Likes: 29
From: Smithfield, VA
Forgive my stupidity but if he is running this amp bridged then there are only two channels total, correct? If he puts the two 8ohm speakers on one channel then doesn't that only leave one channel for additional speakers not two?
Seasoned HDF Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 10,637
Likes: 1,246
From: Lake, Ms
Originally Posted by MMXIWG
Forgive my stupidity but if he is running this amp bridged then there are only two channels total, correct? If he puts the two 8ohm speakers on one channel then doesn't that only leave one channel for additional speakers not two?
Last edited by SBates08; Nov 22, 2017 at 09:38 PM.
Trending Topics
Stellar HDF Member
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 2,171
Likes: 188
From: Manitowoc county
running in that configuration presents a 3 channel output
HD Forum Stories
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
Jason Momoa Is Turning Classic Harleys Into PHEVs
Verdad Gallardo
Harley-Davidson Fat Boy Becomes a Dark, Decepticon-Inspired Custom
Verdad Gallardo
6 Weirdest Harley-Davidsons Ever Sold to the Public
Verdad Gallardo
7 Times Harley-Davidson Chucked Tradition Out the Window
Verdad Gallardo
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Verdad Gallardo
8 Best Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
10 Worst Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
Killer Custom's Jail Break Is The Breakout That Refused to Blend In
Verdad Gallardo
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Verdad Gallardo
Seasoned HDF Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 10,637
Likes: 1,246
From: Lake, Ms
Originally Posted by MMXIWG
I clearly do not understand this.