Audio Systems Find answers to all of your stereo, speaker and other audio technology questions here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

More efficient setup

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-22-2017, 08:16 AM
flcusat's Avatar
flcusat
flcusat is offline
Tourer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Miami/FL
Posts: 432
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default More efficient setup

OK guys, Let's assume that you have a 4 channel amp that gives you two 300 watts channels on bridge mode, for a 4 Ohms load.
At the same time you have a pair of 8 ohms speakers to hook up to this amp.
Let's say that you want to send 150 watts to each speakers, so you have two choices.

A- Bridge two channels of the amp at 300 Watts, and put the speakers in parallel. This will bring the total load to 4 Ohms in and each speaker gets 150 watts.

B - Bridge two pair of channels at 300 watts and put one speaker on each bridge side, so each speaker receives 150 watts.

Which of this two methods would be moe efficient regarding the amp overal performance (heat, power, etc)
 

Last edited by flcusat; 11-22-2017 at 08:23 AM.
  #2  
Old 11-22-2017, 08:26 AM
SBates08's Avatar
SBates08
SBates08 is offline
Extreme HDF Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Lake, Ms
Posts: 10,636
Received 1,235 Likes on 999 Posts
Default

Option B will be the least stressful on the amp but I would go with option A myself. The amp is designed to run at those specs so in order to optimize the setup, option A is the way to go. Plus it leaves 2 additional channels for more speakers.
 
  #3  
Old 11-22-2017, 08:46 AM
matt76cmich's Avatar
matt76cmich
matt76cmich is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Midland Twp, MI
Posts: 2,267
Received 133 Likes on 124 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by flcusat
OK guys, Let's assume that you have a 4 channel amp that gives you two 300 watts channels on bridge mode, for a 4 Ohms load.
At the same time you have a pair of 8 ohms speakers to hook up to this amp.
Let's say that you want to send 150 watts to each speakers, so you have two choices.

A- Bridge two channels of the amp at 300 Watts, and put the speakers in parallel. This will bring the total load to 4 Ohms in and each speaker gets 150 watts.

B - Bridge two pair of channels at 300 watts and put one speaker on each bridge side, so each speaker receives 150 watts.

Which of this two methods would be moe efficient regarding the amp overal performance (heat, power, etc)
My fairing and lids are ran like option A so i can have my B3 super tweeters on their own channels for EQing and gain control
 
  #4  
Old 11-22-2017, 12:51 PM
sponger's Avatar
sponger
sponger is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: so cal
Posts: 1,168
Received 78 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by flcusat
OK guys, Let's assume that you have a 4 channel amp that gives you two 300 watts channels on bridge mode, for a 4 Ohms load.
At the same time you have a pair of 8 ohms speakers to hook up to this amp.
Let's say that you want to send 150 watts to each speakers, so you have two choices.

A- Bridge two channels of the amp at 300 Watts, and put the speakers in parallel. This will bring the total load to 4 Ohms in and each speaker gets 150 watts.

B - Bridge two pair of channels at 300 watts and put one speaker on each bridge side, so each speaker receives 150 watts.

Which of this two methods would be moe efficient regarding the amp overal performance (heat, power, etc)
I also want to say and im prob wrong here, if the speaker is 8ohm and u go with option B then the speaker will not get 150, but more likely around half that.
 
  #5  
Old 11-22-2017, 01:50 PM
matt76cmich's Avatar
matt76cmich
matt76cmich is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Midland Twp, MI
Posts: 2,267
Received 133 Likes on 124 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sponger
I also want to say and im prob wrong here, if the speaker is 8ohm and u go with option B then the speaker will not get 150, but more likely around half that.
As long as each set of channels are set to the same voltage each 8 ohm speaker would get half of the bridged 4ohm wattage
 
  #6  
Old 11-22-2017, 09:02 PM
MMXIWG's Avatar
MMXIWG
MMXIWG is offline
Road Captain
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Smithfield, VA
Posts: 738
Received 29 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SBates08
Option B will be the least stressful on the amp but I would go with option A myself. The amp is designed to run at those specs so in order to optimize the setup, option A is the way to go. Plus it leaves 2 additional channels for more speakers.
Forgive my stupidity but if he is running this amp bridged then there are only two channels total, correct? If he puts the two 8ohm speakers on one channel then doesn't that only leave one channel for additional speakers not two?
 
  #7  
Old 11-22-2017, 09:36 PM
SBates08's Avatar
SBates08
SBates08 is offline
Extreme HDF Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Lake, Ms
Posts: 10,636
Received 1,235 Likes on 999 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MMXIWG
Forgive my stupidity but if he is running this amp bridged then there are only two channels total, correct? If he puts the two 8ohm speakers on one channel then doesn't that only leave one channel for additional speakers not two?
If you're bridging a 4ch amp to run 2 8ohm speakers, and you're going to run them in parallel on the 2 channels that are bridged to get a 4ohm load, that leaves you 2 more channels to run other speakers.
 

Last edited by SBates08; 11-22-2017 at 09:38 PM.
  #8  
Old 11-22-2017, 11:02 PM
yooperhog's Avatar
yooperhog
yooperhog is offline
Stellar HDF Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Manitowoc county
Posts: 2,137
Received 182 Likes on 161 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SBates08
If you're bridging a 4ch amp to run 2 8ohm speakers, and you're going to run them in parallel on the 2 channels that are bridged to get a 4ohm load, that leaves you 2 more channels to run other speakers.
running in that configuration presents a 3 channel output
 
  #9  
Old 11-22-2017, 11:08 PM
MMXIWG's Avatar
MMXIWG
MMXIWG is offline
Road Captain
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Smithfield, VA
Posts: 738
Received 29 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by yooperhog
running in that configuration presents a 3 channel output
I clearly do not understand this.
 
  #10  
Old 11-22-2017, 11:15 PM
SBates08's Avatar
SBates08
SBates08 is offline
Extreme HDF Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Lake, Ms
Posts: 10,636
Received 1,235 Likes on 999 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MMXIWG
I clearly do not understand this.
You're only bridging 2 channels which makes it 1 channel. Then you parallel the 2-8ohm speakers together on that bridged channel. Then you have 2 more channels which gives you 3 channels total like Yoop said.
 


Quick Reply: More efficient setup



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:43 PM.