Audio Systems Find answers to all of your stereo, speaker and other audio technology questions here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

More efficient setup

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 22, 2017 | 08:16 AM
  #1  
flcusat's Avatar
flcusat
Thread Starter
|
Tourer
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 432
Likes: 10
From: Miami/FL
Default More efficient setup

OK guys, Let's assume that you have a 4 channel amp that gives you two 300 watts channels on bridge mode, for a 4 Ohms load.
At the same time you have a pair of 8 ohms speakers to hook up to this amp.
Let's say that you want to send 150 watts to each speakers, so you have two choices.

A- Bridge two channels of the amp at 300 Watts, and put the speakers in parallel. This will bring the total load to 4 Ohms in and each speaker gets 150 watts.

B - Bridge two pair of channels at 300 watts and put one speaker on each bridge side, so each speaker receives 150 watts.

Which of this two methods would be moe efficient regarding the amp overal performance (heat, power, etc)
 

Last edited by flcusat; Nov 22, 2017 at 08:23 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2017 | 08:26 AM
  #2  
SBates08's Avatar
SBates08
Seasoned HDF Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 10,637
Likes: 1,246
From: Lake, Ms
Default

Option B will be the least stressful on the amp but I would go with option A myself. The amp is designed to run at those specs so in order to optimize the setup, option A is the way to go. Plus it leaves 2 additional channels for more speakers.
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2017 | 08:46 AM
  #3  
matt76cmich's Avatar
matt76cmich
Outstanding HDF Member
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,267
Likes: 135
From: Midland Twp, MI
Default

Originally Posted by flcusat
OK guys, Let's assume that you have a 4 channel amp that gives you two 300 watts channels on bridge mode, for a 4 Ohms load.
At the same time you have a pair of 8 ohms speakers to hook up to this amp.
Let's say that you want to send 150 watts to each speakers, so you have two choices.

A- Bridge two channels of the amp at 300 Watts, and put the speakers in parallel. This will bring the total load to 4 Ohms in and each speaker gets 150 watts.

B - Bridge two pair of channels at 300 watts and put one speaker on each bridge side, so each speaker receives 150 watts.

Which of this two methods would be moe efficient regarding the amp overal performance (heat, power, etc)
My fairing and lids are ran like option A so i can have my B3 super tweeters on their own channels for EQing and gain control
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2017 | 12:51 PM
  #4  
sponger's Avatar
sponger
Road Master
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 79
From: so cal
Default

Originally Posted by flcusat
OK guys, Let's assume that you have a 4 channel amp that gives you two 300 watts channels on bridge mode, for a 4 Ohms load.
At the same time you have a pair of 8 ohms speakers to hook up to this amp.
Let's say that you want to send 150 watts to each speakers, so you have two choices.

A- Bridge two channels of the amp at 300 Watts, and put the speakers in parallel. This will bring the total load to 4 Ohms in and each speaker gets 150 watts.

B - Bridge two pair of channels at 300 watts and put one speaker on each bridge side, so each speaker receives 150 watts.

Which of this two methods would be moe efficient regarding the amp overal performance (heat, power, etc)
I also want to say and im prob wrong here, if the speaker is 8ohm and u go with option B then the speaker will not get 150, but more likely around half that.
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2017 | 01:50 PM
  #5  
matt76cmich's Avatar
matt76cmich
Outstanding HDF Member
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,267
Likes: 135
From: Midland Twp, MI
Default

Originally Posted by sponger
I also want to say and im prob wrong here, if the speaker is 8ohm and u go with option B then the speaker will not get 150, but more likely around half that.
As long as each set of channels are set to the same voltage each 8 ohm speaker would get half of the bridged 4ohm wattage
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2017 | 09:02 PM
  #6  
MMXIWG's Avatar
MMXIWG
Road Captain
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 738
Likes: 29
From: Smithfield, VA
Default

Originally Posted by SBates08
Option B will be the least stressful on the amp but I would go with option A myself. The amp is designed to run at those specs so in order to optimize the setup, option A is the way to go. Plus it leaves 2 additional channels for more speakers.
Forgive my stupidity but if he is running this amp bridged then there are only two channels total, correct? If he puts the two 8ohm speakers on one channel then doesn't that only leave one channel for additional speakers not two?
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2017 | 09:36 PM
  #7  
SBates08's Avatar
SBates08
Seasoned HDF Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 10,637
Likes: 1,246
From: Lake, Ms
Default

Originally Posted by MMXIWG
Forgive my stupidity but if he is running this amp bridged then there are only two channels total, correct? If he puts the two 8ohm speakers on one channel then doesn't that only leave one channel for additional speakers not two?
If you're bridging a 4ch amp to run 2 8ohm speakers, and you're going to run them in parallel on the 2 channels that are bridged to get a 4ohm load, that leaves you 2 more channels to run other speakers.
 

Last edited by SBates08; Nov 22, 2017 at 09:38 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2017 | 11:02 PM
  #8  
yooperhog's Avatar
yooperhog
Stellar HDF Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 188
From: Manitowoc county
Default

Originally Posted by SBates08
If you're bridging a 4ch amp to run 2 8ohm speakers, and you're going to run them in parallel on the 2 channels that are bridged to get a 4ohm load, that leaves you 2 more channels to run other speakers.
running in that configuration presents a 3 channel output
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2017 | 11:08 PM
  #9  
MMXIWG's Avatar
MMXIWG
Road Captain
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 738
Likes: 29
From: Smithfield, VA
Default

Originally Posted by yooperhog
running in that configuration presents a 3 channel output
I clearly do not understand this.
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2017 | 11:15 PM
  #10  
SBates08's Avatar
SBates08
Seasoned HDF Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 10,637
Likes: 1,246
From: Lake, Ms
Default

Originally Posted by MMXIWG
I clearly do not understand this.
You're only bridging 2 channels which makes it 1 channel. Then you parallel the 2-8ohm speakers together on that bridged channel. Then you have 2 more channels which gives you 3 channels total like Yoop said.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:54 PM.