When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Mike
All the suggestions are great and getting you going down the right track. The only downfall with your system right now that I can see for getting your system up and running with your current amps is that you will be stuck running the 8s in you bags in stereo and not parallel/bridged. as the TN4 900 is only stable at a 4 ohm load bridged.
Splitting the channels for 6.5 and 6x9 would be just to run Y splitters and combined the left and right channels (sum them).
I am free for the next few days and can give you a hand or chat about the next steps that need to be takin to get you ship to shore.
Drop me a dime after 3pm this week
yes, my suggestion was to get every thing off on it's own for tuning purposes. Get the 8' on thier own at 300 each on the 600.1 and get the TP speakers on channel 1-2 of the TN and 6x9's on ch 3-4. The dsp and 600.1 was way less expensive than the 6150.
I was already second guessing the 600.1 put it on hold! I have to replace the TN 900 (RCA input loose). I was thinking of replacing it with 2 SD amps or 6150 but 2 SD amps are cheaper say 1200.4 and 600.1 and or 400.4..any suggestions welcomed with open arms...and open wallet (actually 0% CC} along with having a garage sale in used audio section...LOL
I was already second guessing the 600.1 put it on hold! I have to replace the TN 900 (RCA input loose). I was thinking of replacing it with 2 SD amps or 6150 but 2 SD amps are cheaper say 1200.4 and 600.1 and or 400.4..any suggestions welcomed with open arms...and open wallet (actually 0% CC} along with having a garage sale in used audio section...LOL
Mike
Both are good choices, the 1200.4 would be a good choice as it has plenty of power to grow with what you pick later, the 800.4 is a solid choice for most speakers. BUT ,,,,, the choice of the 2ohm or 4 ohm will drive you nuts and may steer you in the right direction for future growth as most of the beyma lineup and PRV lineup are 8 ohm.
Your current speakers are 4 ohm it took me a while to get over stereo mode too. But if you go with say the 2 ohm version you get the most out of your amps and run a pair of speaker in parallel off 2 channels bridged off a 2 ohm SD amp.
This may cause more questions. But, the SD amps really dictate a DSP.
I'd say... Bag's 2-GZ @ 250-300 rms.. Lids...2 Vo 6x9's 150-200 rms... TP VO 6.5 or 7.1 @ 150-200 rms..all 4ohm....I know I will need the DD DSP
SD Options
If ur wanting that power & stat with SD amps then the 800.4 2 ohm gets u the TP & Lids wired bridged & parallel gets u 200w each speaker at 12.6 volts.
Then the 600.1 2 ohm version gets u 300w each bag 8 wired in parallel. The 400.4 gets u 200 each wired bridged at 12.6.
The 1200.4 at 4 ohm would be perfect for your build if u had 8 ohm speakers in the bags.
The TP & Lids would be wired in parallel off 1 & 2 getting u 150 each at 12.6v, then the bags wired bridged in parallel starting w 8 ohm speakers getting u a 4 ohm load thus 300 each speaker. Kind of why building these setups around amp & speaker combos on paper before spending any cash is not a bad idea.
Lots of other options if u come off that watt desire or want other brands.
TP & Lids wired bridged & parallel gets u 200w each speaker at 12.6 volts
Question here T. I know on my bike I had to push more power to the 6x9s than the TP pod speakers to keep the pod speakers from getting too loud too quick. In other words I was hearing the TP speakers before the 6x9s really came online. Would Mike run into that problem having the lids and pods in parallel on the same channel?
Also I had that same problem when I had my lowers and rear pods on the same channel. Drove me nuts and I couldn't blend them properly until each set of speakers got their own channel.
Question here T. I know on my bike I had to push more power to the 6x9s than the TP pod speakers to keep the pod speakers from getting too loud too quick. In other words I was hearing the TP speakers before the 6x9s really came online. Would Mike run into that problem having the lids and pods in parallel on the same channel?
Also I had that same problem when I had my lowers and rear pods on the same channel. Drove me nuts and I couldn't blend them properly until each set of speakers got their own channel.
If you parallel pairs together you control then separate. Example, both tp parallel together on a channel and both lids together. You lose left to right stereo but gain separate eq and output control.
Question here T. I know on my bike I had to push more power to the 6x9s than the TP pod speakers to keep the pod speakers from getting too loud too quick. In other words I was hearing the TP speakers before the 6x9s really came online. Would Mike run into that problem having the lids and pods in parallel on the same channel?
Also I had that same problem when I had my lowers and rear pods on the same channel. Drove me nuts and I couldn't blend them properly until each set of speakers got their own channel.
If u read back a few posts I think u will find that the OP was in the same general mindset.
In parallel for some means that u wire in parallel the stuff that's on the left side of the sled regardless of the speaker size and specs on channel 1/2 eg, and the same logic for the right on 3/4.
I would recommend that u never wire anything in parallel that is not the same or damn near the same.
In this case of the 800.4 the lids would be on 1/2 and TP on 3/4 so any difference in presence, SPL etc can all be balanced out via tuning.
If u parallel a 6.5 and a 6x9 on 1/2 then again on 3/4 ur basically fuxxed.
U picking up what I'm laying down? You really should never wire 2 different speakers makes & models in parallel on the same channel thus a very different yet simple wiring strategy change. Maybe 10 mins fixes it.
T
Last edited by Tailwind; Feb 22, 2019 at 07:45 AM.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.