When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
If you are running a high power 55 Amp alternator at full power at 14 volts, thats 770 watts. Even if you ignore efficiency losses, if you are running your amp beyond that, then youll be sucking the additional needed power from the battery. Even if you are running the LiFe 6 amp-hour battery, you/dont have much time before you run out of power...
So, unless you are just riding a mile or two, I dont see how you can cruise any distance if your 1,000 watt amp is really putting out 1,000 watts...or even 700....or 500 if you are running any other accessories.
Alot of people are running way more than 1000 watts. And the amp draw is dynamic, continously changing. Never a issue.
Holy dynamo! Major revelation once we start talking mono set ups! Basically take your 2 ohm stable 4 channel amp and control each channel separately per pair of speaks. All of a sudden way more speaker combos off your 4 channel amp and line levellers/DSP.
BRILLIANT!!
Yep Im running 6 speaks off a 4 channel Focal FDP Sport
So is the answer to bridge everything in mono and get every last watt out of an amp? What about things like headroom, efficiency, degradation of sound quality?
So is the answer to bridge everything in mono and get every last watt out of an amp? What about things like headroom, efficiency, degradation of sound quality?
For me it is not about getting every last watt out and leave no headroom. It is about thinking about different ways to connect you system to get the most out of it. I couldn't figure out how I was going to get my amp and speaker combo working well together.
My amp is 4 x 250W @ 4 ohm or 2 ohm. Many have said this is good for an 8 speaker set up but then I would ask questions and the answers would come back not a good idea to parallel speakers with different sensitivity or placing 6x9 and 6.5" in parallel is a bad idea because your filters need to be set different to be effective. Then this thread happened and it made sense. 4 channels = 4 input RCA = 4 opportunities to set levels and filters. I was trapped thinking solely about front and rear with a left and right channel. MONO gives me the ability to put 125W to each speaker and tune each set of 2 to the correct frequency range and output level. Thus I have not left any power on the table and balanced my system through proper tuning. If I have this philosophy wrong please correct me.
For me it is not about getting every last watt out and leave no headroom. It is about thinking about different ways to connect you system to get the most out of it. I couldn't figure out how I was going to get my amp and speaker combo working well together.
My amp is 4 x 250W @ 4 ohm or 2 ohm. Many have said this is good for an 8 speaker set up but then I would ask questions and the answers would come back not a good idea to parallel speakers with different sensitivity or placing 6x9 and 6.5" in parallel is a bad idea because your filters need to be set different to be effective. Then this thread happened and it made sense. 4 channels = 4 input RCA = 4 opportunities to set levels and filters. I was trapped thinking solely about front and rear with a left and right channel. MONO gives me the ability to put 125W to each speaker and tune each set of 2 to the correct frequency range and output level. Thus I have not left any power on the table and balanced my system through proper tuning. If I have this philosophy wrong please correct me.
U r correct sir. With a DSP a channel is a channel that can be tuned independently. On damn near all amps the ***** are generally for pairs of channels ie 1/2, 3/4, 5/6.
If u have the watts to parallel & a DSP, wire them to a specific channel and tune away for that specific channel unlinked.
Caution, some DSPs allow u to unlink the tune with the exception of the crossovers & slopes. Plan & shop accordingly.
One day I might grow up to be big and strong! At that time I will look back on the journey and be glad all of my coaches helped train me! Thanks for all the help to all the members of this community! Seek to understand with a questioning attitude and you will become an effective individual.
So when I purchase a DSP It seems the DSI-2 may be the best for this application for my set up. After doing a little more research it appears to have the ability to tune each channel independently for slope, filters, and gains. I believe the DSR-1 is only capable of un-linking pairs of channels to set gains independently. I really would rather purchase one DSP, instead of two due to making the wrong choice. So in the opinion of those vastly more experienced than myself, could you please share some recommendations for a dsp. I do not want to leave a bunch on the table.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.