When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Dyna Glide ModelsSuper Glide, Super Glide Sport, Super Glide Custom, Dyna Glide Convertible, Super Glide T-Sport, Dyna Glide Police, Dyna Switchback, Low Rider, Street Bob, Fat Bob and Wide Glide.
I have a 2008 FXDF with Progressive 444 nominal 12" shocks. I'm considering 12.5" or 13" shocks to increase the suspension travel. A longer shock will raise the rear .5" to .75" and will also reduce the rake angle. If you did this what were the results?
Thanks for your responses.
09 FXDL. Installed 13.5 rear shocks and I love it. Rides so much better, it seems to turn in quicker. No issues in straight
line speed. The lean is better, not as good as my FXR, but way better than stock.
I'd say try it, if you don't like it you can always sell the shocks.
Changing the rear shocks will not change Rake. Has nothing to do with it. Unless some how you manage to bend the frame at the neck
Of course longer shocks will change the rake. As per the photo, rake angle is the determined by the line formed by the fork tubes (usually parallel with the neck of the frame) and a true vertical line, assuming the bike is on level ground. Longer rear shocks raise the rear of the frame, decreasing the angle, hence the rake. Shorter rear shocks lower the rear of the frame, increasing the rake.
OP: I haven't done it myself but the people I've talked to about it have been happy with the results. Of course they were looking for better handling anyway and the quickened up steering was a benefit as far as they were concerned.
Of course longer shocks will change the rake. As per the photo, rake angle is the determined by the line formed by the fork tubes (usually parallel with the neck of the frame) and a true vertical line, assuming the bike is on level ground. Longer rear shocks raise the rear of the frame, decreasing the angle, hence the rake. Shorter rear shocks lower the rear of the frame, increasing the rake.
OP: I haven't done it myself but the people I've talked to about it have been happy with the results. Of course they were looking for better handling anyway and the quickened up steering was a benefit as far as they were concerned.
Wrong. Try building a few sidecar rigs it You looking at it wrong the rake is in the neck and the tree. the rake angle is not changed if you raise the rear .
A different way to put it: The rake is going to be determined by the frame and triple trees. Raising or lowering at the rear of the bike will affect the trail. At the end of the matter, what youre mostly concerned about is the trail. Keep in mind the offset of the triple trees also affects the trail.
To the OP, not unless youre taking the bike to the track, youre not gonna be noticing a huge difference with a change in trail. The biggest thing youre going to notice is you will be able to lean the bike over further without things scraping . That is the main benefit.
Changing the rear shocks will not change Rake. Has nothing to do with it. Unless some how you manage to bend the frame at the neck
Originally Posted by smitty901
Wrong. Try building a few sidecar rigs it You looking at it wrong the rake is in the neck and the tree. the rake angle is not changed if you raise the rear .
No, you're wrong, basic high school trigonometry (the study of angles) is your friend. Rake angle, as measured in degrees can be altered by simply increasing rear end height. Your theory is contrictardictory to logic.
I have been running 13.5" rear shocks on my 14' fxdf for quite a few years now. Turn in is slightly quicker, in a good way. It corners "better". The increase in travel is also a benefit for clearance and rougher roads, ride, etc.
btw- increase in rear height does change rake "angle" and trail "angle" (however in this case is subtle). Rake "angle" is the combination of rake, offset and trail and measured off vertical. Any change in any of the angles affects all since they all combine for 90.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.