Dyna Glide Models Super Glide, Super Glide Sport, Super Glide Custom, Dyna Glide Convertible, Super Glide T-Sport, Dyna Glide Police, Dyna Switchback, Low Rider, Street Bob, Fat Bob and Wide Glide.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Standard or Heavy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 12:50 PM
  #11  
dklozik's Avatar
dklozik
Tourer
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 439
Likes: 21
From: League City, Texas
Default RE: Standard or Heavy

Not trying to hijack a thread here but I have a question. Chip, how much lower did the 11" make your bob and do you know the stock shock length ? Thanks.
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 01:10 PM
  #12  
Chipstah's Avatar
Chipstah
Road Warrior
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,900
Likes: 1
From: Backwoods of NH
Default RE: Standard or Heavy

412 11" shocks will lower the bike almost 1" I suspect, but never measured it. I have a 29" inseam (although 6' tall) and needed to get both my feet flat on the ground. Now no problem, plus the contour of front of the Mustang seat helps too. Haven't scraped the pegs yet either.

Pretty sure the stock shocks on the street bob are 12".
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 01:22 PM
  #13  
Dawg Rider's Avatar
Dawg Rider
Road Warrior
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,443
Likes: 3
From: Sasser, GA
Default RE: Standard or Heavy

Did you go with heavier fork oil? I have progressive fork springs already, but I'm condsidering using heavier oil like some on here have mentioned.
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 01:36 PM
  #14  
Chipstah's Avatar
Chipstah
Road Warrior
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,900
Likes: 1
From: Backwoods of NH
Default RE: Standard or Heavy

yes, Amsoil.
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 03:09 PM
  #15  
SPECIAL ED's Avatar
SPECIAL ED
Thread Starter
|
Elite HDF Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,572
Likes: 5
From: Templeton California
Default RE: Standard or Heavy

What weight oil? I used 15wt on my SV with Racetech springs and emulators but that's apples and oranges.Progressive front prings and heavier oil will be my next mods.
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 03:17 PM
  #16  
Chipstah's Avatar
Chipstah
Road Warrior
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,900
Likes: 1
From: Backwoods of NH
Default RE: Standard or Heavy

It was a while ago and got it from my indy on his recommendation but don't exactly remember - might have been the Amsoil #10 but wouldn't swear to it. Might want to check with Progressive for their recommendation.
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 04:35 PM
  #17  
kzad's Avatar
kzad
Advanced
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Ct
Default RE: Standard or Heavy

1"shorter shocks would lower the bike 1" if they were attached to the axle, andmounted straight up and down. Because they are attached to the swingarm with the pivot point in front and the axle behind, and mounted at an angle, it results in more than 1" lower seat height. The Works Performance web site has an application chart...according toit 3/4 inchshorter shocks result in a 1-1/4 lower ride height on an '06 FXDL....judging by that a 1"shorter shock would drop you around 1 5/8"
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 05:06 PM
  #18  
ode sku's Avatar
ode sku
Advanced
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Standard or Heavy

hd is what i run im 165 and like them alot easily adjusted for 2-up with wifey
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 05:23 PM
  #19  
TOMMAY's Avatar
TOMMAY
Stellar HDF Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,622
Likes: 7
From: Gulf Coast
Default RE: Standard or Heavy

ORIGINAL: kzad

1"shorter shocks would lower the bike 1" if they were attached to the axle, andmounted straight up and down. Because they are attached to the swingarm with the pivot point in front and the axle behind, and mounted at an angle, it results in more than 1" lower seat height. The Works Performance web site has an application chart...according toit 3/4 inchshorter shocks result in a 1-1/4 lower ride height on an '06 FXDL....judging by that a 1"shorter shock would drop you around 1 5/8"
Ditto on that,heavy duties on the lightest setting really slam the bike,the lip of the fender is below the bead on the tire,looks great and rides plenty firm but handles great. You will become adept at dodgin potholes after a while to avoid braking your bike.

Keep in mind that the lightest settin will lower the bike the most. The more preload the higher the bike will sit.



Good Luck

Tom
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 10:16 PM
  #20  
PsTaN's Avatar
PsTaN
Road Master
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 1
From: FootBaLL FieLD
Default RE: Standard or Heavy

Good thread .... very informative. When I lowered my bike I went with the H-D Shocks knowing they wouldnt really slam the bike/perform better .... they would lower 1" and wereeasily had so I got them. I love the look of the 11", but have always worried about the trade-off they would seem to force one into .... pre-load them to ball bustin' firm or unload them and worry over breakin' stuff that dont need breakin'.

I ride with the H-D lows on pre-load setting 4 and the shocks are exactly 11.5" on the bolt centers with 1" of tire showing between the wheel and bottom of the fender. I think a Progressive 11.5" shock would lower my bike more? .... I certainly feel they would perform better based on the opinions here.

I'm really looking forward to seeing someone put some 11.5" Progressive 418/440 on a bike so we can get a close look at exactly the stance they produce. I do believe that will be the point at which I make up my mind (11 or 11.5)and get new shocks to enjoy the benefits of the better handling and ride that all you guys speak of.

PsTaN
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Brad&Mar
Ignition/Tuner/ECM/Fuel Injection
0
Apr 27, 2013 09:01 AM
mikeo33y
Dyna Glide Models
11
Jan 2, 2013 10:58 PM
Yates
Touring Parts
4
Feb 8, 2012 09:04 AM
Cpitch
Sportster Models
4
Sep 17, 2009 05:54 PM
KooeL49
Dyna Glide Models
5
Feb 12, 2008 03:20 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:03 AM.