Ridgid Bob??
... your all a bunch of dadmn sheep anyhow.
don't get pissed at us that your "dream" bike is gonna cost you some serious jack. while that may not be the advice/feedback you WANT...that's the reality of the situation. look, i was SAR for a few years, i know your training at somepoint has to tell you to quite trying to make something in to something it isn't. accept the reality of situation.
what your trying to do is gonna cost you. whether you do it or someone else does.
[IMG]local://upfiles/19138/DA57FF5F449B4939BBFCC1A80F2B1CDE.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]local://upfiles/19138/1FE244DAD92E4F8D9BDF31EFCBD8ADE1.jpg[/IMG]
Again, I am sorry we are not all able to tell you what you want to hear but you did ask. If you're gonna **** on everybody's response, good luck getting help next time. I don't think you have enough of a clue of what is going on. I'd suggest you slow down and do some more research before spending another nickel.
Thumbnail Image
your about 40 years late
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
The majority of the messages left here have nothing to do with the function or the feasibility of the Ridgid the idea behind this thread was to get advice from someone who's done it thought about it or seen it done not start a pissing contest on weather or not I should chop up MY bike to build it the way I want it. As far a Jesse James goes he never has let his bike building and his TV popularity conflict you tell me builder who builds a harder faster more harecore old skool ride. Ness is all about flash Martin bros and OCC are all about trash. Bourgett builds a nice bike Indian Larry tried even Billy Lane has alot of good ideas he builds a hell of a powerplant and then has to leave the lines all jagged and unfinshed Exiles are too fat. There are a few little shops out there building some ok stuff but the majority of them are missing something they just order a bunch of parts from a book and sling them together. My Bob is a great starting point the lines are clean the engine has potential it just is lacking some things. I am only thinking about the ridgid rear sextion in order to offset some cost I have a kit in mind thats only about 4g's. I probably will go with it. Yes I admit I do have a limited background in motorcycle fabrication but I do have a strong and successful background in automotives I've built and maintained more than a few musclecars and even a cpl tuners. The basic theroys of the mechanics are the same accross the board. My bigger rear tire equals larger contact patch equals more traction. Longer fork and increased rake will equal greater caster angle equating better straight line stability. Bigger distplacment equals more fun. Don't tell me I don't know what I'm talking about. I was just looking for a bit of advice on a idea I had. Sorry i made that mistake of askig for opinions on it from a group of closed minded followers it for damn sure won't happen again. You'll all seem way to stuck in you little bubbles to think outside the box and push the limits of what you think and attempt to do what you want and I'm sorry for that too. Same thing happend in the 70's and the choppers and Bobers were born 20 years later the rest of you think they are cool some of us always did.
[IMG]local://upfiles/19138/DA57FF5F449B4939BBFCC1A80F2B1CDE.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]local://upfiles/19138/1FE244DAD92E4F8D9BDF31EFCBD8ADE1.jpg[/IMG]
Steel, you have every right to buy any bike you want, chop it to Hades and back, and have a blast doin' it. When someone doesn't agree with that particular method of wailin' on a bike, then it tells me they probably don't know the history of bobbers, choppers, and every other custom bike design. That's where this whole industry started. But when you have someone tell you that in their opinion you're foolish for doin' what you want to do, shine 'em on, and don't waste your breath.
Next, Steel, I'm gonna clue you in on a bit of a history lesson 'cause I'm an ol' fart and I like to talk about the history of muttersickles.
Ness is flash now. Back in the '70s he built the slimmest and trimmest Sporties seen. They were jewels, and clean simple machines.
Martin Brothers are flash-trash & OCC, well, they're just weird.
Indian Larry didn't try to build old school (I'm really starting to get tired of that moniker); he built what he wanted, and they were built in the old way. The man was genius-down-to-earth.
Billy Lane is/was an artist with some far out ideas. But don't try tellin' me about his engine building prowess. Mechanically on motors, he was pretty much clueless, as seen when he tried putting 2 huge carbs on a mill and couldn't mak






