When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Dyna Glide ModelsSuper Glide, Super Glide Sport, Super Glide Custom, Dyna Glide Convertible, Super Glide T-Sport, Dyna Glide Police, Dyna Switchback, Low Rider, Street Bob, Fat Bob and Wide Glide.
I just started thinking about this myself. I want to raise my front end with some longer fork tubes, but I was told I'd need to rake it some in order to make it handle right. Anyone know if that is true, or is it a misconception? I've read where they say if you add four inches to the tubes that it is like raising the height 2 inches and pushing out the wheel 2 inches. I'm wondering if with my Dyna frame and normal rake if it wouldn't be more like 3 inches higher, and 1 inch forward movement? Do I have to pull the fork tube out of the slider leg in order to tell how long it is, or is it indicated some way else?
There is a link to a good rake and trail calculator on this page. Just take some time and figure out what would be best for you. Should also be a link to a list of stock tube lengths.
i bought a 72 flh with 4" over fork tubes and cowbells.. i didn't even know till i looked at it parked next to another flh at a bike shop. after riding it for a year or two, i bought a stock length set. honestly i couldn't even tell a difference riding it except for putting my feet down a little less at a stop.. sorry, the only pic i have of it then is a blurry 11 year old poloroid
I found this one. Thought it was a great example of not raking a frame a just putting giant tubes on. Just wanted to share what I thought was a great picture.
Yeah, I had a couple of bikes like that in the early 70s. The look makes me laugh now. Extended forks without the rake fell out of fashion pretty quickly, in favor of raking to get the height back down in the front.
A lot of it was cost. We could slap on a set of extended tubes for about 75 bucks, and think we looked like Easy Rider.
I pulled into the local HD Stealership today on my 15 WG. As I was walking up to the door I saw a guy on a 13 WG getting his gear on. He had the rear slammed with Progressive (he wasn't sure which one but said it was the smallest one they had) and he had the 6 inch over fork tubes. Let me tell you something, that **** looked badass!
I asked how the handling was on corners and straight aways and he said the really slow turns took a little getting used to but the ride itself improved greatly. Said it was a lot smoother.
Yeah, it's winter and I'm bored but I was wondering if anyone runs longer than stock fork tubes with the stock rake? Like uncut frame and zero rake in the trees? The reason I ask is that my Springer is considered 3 over stock and I got to thinking..... where are the 2, 4 or 6 over fork tubes on the Dyna's? I know there has to be a $hitload of greybeard's who remember the 70's when every other Superglide had longer than stock forks. If you got them..... OR HAD THEM, can you post up a pic??? I think that would be cool as hell to see pictures.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.