Fueling 525 vs. SE 204?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

May 28, 2014 | 02:01 PM

#11

ajmilberg

Thread Starter

Tourer

Joined: Nov 2012

Posts: 421

Likes: 2

From: Missouri

Quote:

Originally Posted by Foxster

Do either of them allow accurate timing adjustment? Both those cams have 8° of timing built in that you'll need to adjust for in the timing or the bike will run like crap after.

They claim +/- 20 degree timing adjustment with the power commander.

Jan 1, 2015 | 08:55 PM

#12

Jackpoticorn

Road Captain

Joined: Jun 2014

Posts: 508

Likes: 31

From: California

Can anybody sound off of the 525??? Seat of pants dyno thoughts vs. 204???

Jan 1, 2015 | 10:00 PM

#13

HD Pilot

Elite HDF Member

Joined: Sep 2012

Posts: 3,791

Likes: 57

From: N Texas

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jackpoticorn

Can anybody sound off of the 525??? Seat of pants dyno thoughts vs. 204???

Where do you want your cams to excel? 204 cam specs point toward the lower rpms, while the 525 look more like mid to higher rpms. 204s look to make more sense to me or maybe Andrews 48.

Jan 2, 2015 | 05:28 AM

#14

target64

Stellar HDF Member

Joined: Jan 2013

Posts: 2,464

Likes: 50

From: Rouses Point, N.Y.

with that later 42 intake closing on the 525"s, the compression would have to be address for sure it would be a turd in the bottom. like HD pilot suggested the Andrews 48 would be a better choice IMHO. know of a few running around here in stock 96 er's and are happy with the performance.