What to expect from headwork?
If you pull the heads, have them worked and setup for the 57 cams and a .030" head gasket; that will register on the butt dyno. Should be good for at least 10TQ/HP with a good tune.
But I guess my question to the OP is;
What exactly are you trying to accomplish?
Trending Topics
disregard my previous question. didn't read properly.
Ok so here's what I see with you and is the same thing I saw when doing my own. Also keep in mind without actually measuring it, you should assume with stock HD setup, pistons as being .005 in the hole front and rear. It's usually in the range of .000 to .008, but assume .005 for good measure.
So with that said. Here's what you're looking at with your current build, stock build, and headwork.
STOCK
Andrews 57H
Andrews 57H w .030 Head Gasket
Andrews 57H w .030 HG and 82cc Headwork
Now what you're seeing here is simply 2 facts and 1 I want to point out to you.
1. You want to keep your CCP under 200 or at least pretty close to it. If you don't you'll have a great running bike on 92 octane and then it will run like **** on 87 octane if you run into that problem where 92 is not available. You want a bike that will run both without knocking and pinging you to death.
Fact 1. Changing cams doesn't change your static compression, only corrected and CCP
Fact 2. Doing headwork or changing head gaskets changes all 3, static - corrected - and CCP.
Now another thing to point out. Don't believe all you see about charts on this or any other site. Those charts are to be used for comparative purposes only and I woulnd't use any of those as assumed results from doing what they did. Look at the curves and look at the AFR on these charts. This tells you where your peak HP and peak TQ are going to be made and usually when trying to sell something a vendor will throw up 6th gear WOT runs as that's where they are going to show the best information. Now thing think about where you ride. You're not riding in 6th gear at WOT EVER! So I'll say it again as I've done many times before and my word is not gospel, only educated enough to know the difference:
Determine FROM YOUR RIDING STYLE what you want to achieve and build from there. If you want to chase peak HP and TQ numbers you're going to wind up with a bike that's not a whole lot of fun to ride.
Personally I think going from a 103 to a 107 kit is a total waste of time and $. I achieved with 82cc heads, a good head pipe, a good set of mufflers, 57H cams, and good A/C the same or better results than some of these 107 kits I'm seeing posted all over hell's-half-acre and at 1/2 or less the cost. The extra 2 - 3 HP and 2 - 4 TQ you're going to gain are never going to be realized by you, your riding style, or your seat of the pants dyno. If you're going to go through all that, you might as well go to 117 or 120 and attend to your bottom end while you're at it. I'm no expert by any means, but listening to those that are I won't move a 103 to anything higher than a 107 without bottom-end being done.. That's just me. I don't want people coming back to me with problems later on down the road.
That's my .02
Last edited by UltraNutZ; Dec 9, 2014 at 05:19 PM.
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders









