Head porting a stock 103"
Thread Starter
|
Road Captain
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 610
Likes: 53
From: Kennesaw, GA
I'm not "reluctant to utilizing a good fuel management system". Not sure how you got that from my posts. I'm well aware of the fact that if I port the heads, I will need additional fuel. I have modified a few bikes in the past. How exactly do you know I've left 5-10 hp/tq on the table by utilizing the HD re-flash?
HDF Community Team
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,776
Likes: 2,607
From: san antonio
I'm not "reluctant to utilizing a good fuel management system". Not sure how you got that from my posts. I'm well aware of the fact that if I port the heads, I will need additional fuel. I have modified a few bikes in the past. How exactly do you know I've left 5-10 hp/tq on the table by utilizing the HD re-flash?
Well, I figured that since you have not employed a good fuel management system over the HD flash that you were reluctant to employ a good fuel management system. I know you left some TQ/HP on the table because the HD flash is one size fits all, adds a bit of fuel across the rpm range but not necessarily where needed, raises the rev limit and is designed for a specific combination of HD parts. You have removed the cat and installed slip ons which I assume are aftermarket, so the flash is not designed for your application. Additionally, I have seen it proven on a local tuner's dyno (happens to be one of the best in the country) over and over again.
No disrespect intended but I don't care how good you think your tuner was with the Redshift cams, which are not that aggressive, if he couldn't resolve your driveability issues, you should have found another tuner.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gi_king_ken
General Harley Davidson Chat
12
Apr 3, 2016 02:27 AM
nosillyname
Exhaust System Topics
20
Dec 13, 2010 08:16 PM
