When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Engine Mechanical TopicsDiscussion for motor builds, cams, head work, stripped bolts and other engine related issues. The good and the bad. If it goes round and around or up and down, post it here.
Here is the part # for the pistons
HARLEY-DAVIDSON® SCREAMIN’ EAGLE® PRO TWIN CAM HIGHCOMPRESSION CAST PISTON KITS* – 3-7/8" - 22661-99A
These high-compression 10.25:1 cast pistons are designed for use in a Twin Cam engine equipped with stock cylinder heads and 3-7/8" cylinders (1550). Piston kit includes rings, clips and pins. All EFI models require ECM calibration (priced separately).
Cams are se 204 part # 25149-00
HI Frank,
Glad you got the detonation under control. Keep a keen ear open for further detonation as the temps rise. Those cast pistons won't withstand much before Scott's and Kirby's predictions become a reality.
I guess what really bothers me is the guy who did the build is well respected, did 100s of these builds, is a TTS tuner instructor, and I 'm wondering why he put these cams in in the first place? I ride aggressivly and rarely am I at the speed limit. What would be the best cam so I wouldn't have to worry about this pinging , hot weather , etc.. and still get top performance?
Thanks everyone for all your replies.
Yea those guys are correct. It all computes to approx. 9.86:1 dynamic with a ccp of approx. 207 psi. If you ain't running at least 98-100 octane you will have problems. IMHO woods tw-555. puts your dynamic right at 9.6 and breathes real well...
I guess what really bothers me is the guy who did the build is well respected, did 100s of these builds, is a TTS tuner instructor, and I 'm wondering why he put these cams in in the first place? I ride aggressivly and rarely am I at the speed limit. What would be the best cam so I wouldn't have to worry about this pinging , hot weather , etc.. and still get top performance?
Thanks everyone for all your replies.
Frank, one thing to consider to provide some degree of safety is a head cooling fan to keep combustion temps in the ideal range. I installed a JIMS Forceflow recently for that very reason and am delighted with it and its effects as ambient temps have risen to the mid-to-upper 80's here in south Texas in the last few weeks. Not subtle. I DO NOT wish to hijack your thread with a debate about which brand of cooling fan is better, just wanted to throw that out there to you for consideration in your situation, regardless of the brand you may choose.
I guess what really bothers me is the guy who did the build is well respected, did 100s of these builds, is a TTS tuner instructor, and I 'm wondering why he put these cams in in the first place? I ride aggressivly and rarely am I at the speed limit. What would be the best cam so I wouldn't have to worry about this pinging , hot weather , etc.. and still get top performance? Thanks everyone for all your replies.
The numbers don't bode well for the future of the motor but, so far, all we have seen are calculations. You mentioned 10.5 pistons in the OP and the later 10.25 pistons; not much difference but just noted. You have not mentioned model year, head gasket thickness and whether or not the heads have been worked, more specifically chamber volume. I have seen OEM chamber volumes at near 90cc; makes a huge difference in compression compared to the typical chamber volume of 85-86cc.
How about measuring actual CCP before coming to any rash decisions about changing cams? The model year, particularly the heads, would also help in selecting a replacement cam if that is the route you choose to follow. Early heads are limited to .510" lift; '05 and later heads will carry up to .600" lift because of the beehive springs.
The head cooling fan is a great idea as well in a high compression motor that generates more heat. How does the bike run now compared to before the dyno tweak? Same power or down a bit on power?
Go at this one step at a time based on actual data; not the calculated data being cited in the thread so far.
Sorry man, this is all new to me. The bike is 2005 Softail springer. No head work was done at the time of the re build ( stock). The pistons are in fact 10.25. The head gasket used was SEpart # 16101-01 multi layered ?
Its pretty cool out today around 70 and the bike ran fine, no pinging. Since the re build the torque and power gains have been pretty dramatic from what it was. Has not been on the dyno yet and only has 350 miles on the re build.
Sorry man, this is all new to me. The bike is 2005 Softail springer. No head work was done at the time of the re build ( stock). The pistons are in fact 10.25. The head gasket used was SEpart # 16101-01 multi layered ?
Its pretty cool out today around 70 and the bike ran fine, no pinging. Since the re build the torque and power gains have been pretty dramatic from what it was. Has not been on the dyno yet and only has 350 miles on the re build.
Start by getting a quality compression tester with the correct adapter fitting for the HD spark plug size and thread and measure the actual CCP (cold cranking compression) with a fully charged battery and the automatic compression releases disabled (if so equipped). Once we know the actual CCP and the cams currently installed, we can be of much greater assistance in assessing any issues should you wish for that type of help.
Start by getting a quality compression tester with the correct adapter fitting for the HD spark plug size and thread and measure the actual CCP (cold cranking compression) with a fully charged battery and the automatic compression releases disabled (if so equipped). Once we know the actual CCP and the cams currently installed, we can be of much greater assistance in assessing any issues should you wish for that type of help.
Everyone who replied here has you pretty well covered. I just wanted to second what djl said vis a vis chamber volume. Scott milled my heads to get the chamber volume DOWN to 88cc. Stock is supposed to be 85. So what I'm getting at is, if your chambers are oversized like mine, your compression isn't as high as you think. Which would be good for your situation: it's possible - even likely - that you ended up with tolerable compression for that cam.
As suggested above, do a compression test and that will give you (and the forum members advising you) a better idea what you have.
Right on.
After the install of larger vavles with reversed tulips, along with chamber work and a valve job, many times the chamber is larger than 85cc.
Scott
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.